22 All this has taken place so that there might be fulfilled what was spoken by the Lord through the prophet, saying,
23 ‘Behold, the young woman will conceive and will bear a son, and they will call his name his name Immanuel’, which is translated ‘God with us’.
Matt. 1:22-23 (My translation)
The announcement that Jesus will ‘save his people from their sins’ is followed immediately by the reference to the prophecy in Isaiah about a virgin or young woman who will bear a son whose name will be Immanuel (Isaiah 7:14).
This child will not actually do anything: he does not grow up to become a saviour or king. But his birth will be a sign to king Ahaz that within a few years Judah will be overrun by the Assyrians because he was unwilling to trust God (7:10-13): ‘The Lord will bring upon you and upon your people and upon your father’s house such days as have not come since the day that Ephraim departed from Judah – the king of Assyria’ (7:17). The river of the Assyrian army will flow into the land of the child Immanuel (8:8), but it will not in the end sweep away Jerusalem and the house of David. The fact that ‘God is with us’ is an assurance that when Jerusalem faces military disaster, God will not allow his people to be completely overwhelmed (8:9-10).
Matthew transfers this paradigm to the situation faced by first century Israel: the birth of Jesus is similarly a sign - by virtue of its exceptional circumstances - that when the nation faces destruction, God will nevertheless be present and will preserve those who fear him. This is what it means to ‘save his people from their sins’ (Matt. 1:21). For Matthew the birth of Jesus is eschatologically significant - it has to do with the end of the age of second temple Judaism. It is not made an argument for an incarnational understanding of the relationship between Jesus and God.
Real theological thinkingMy friend Wes recently sent me this quotation from Henri Nouwen:Real theological thinking, which is thinking with the mind of Christ, is hard to find in the practice of the ministry. Without...(09/06/2010 - 07:13)
Trinitarian theology and missionAnother Xchange session at the Christian Associates Summer Connect (see also The kingdom of God as a means to an end) attempted to address the relevance (or otherwise) of Trinitarian theology for...(08/23/2010 - 10:37)
Euangelion (briefly) on The Future of the People of GodSome brief, non-analytical but very gratifying comments (let’s be honest) on The Future of the People of God from Joel Willitts at Euangelion, including the following:Wow! Read that again...(08/21/2010 - 18:46)
The kingdom of God as a means to an endWhy is the ‘kingdom of God’ such a tricky theological notion? In a group discussion on ‘Kingdom Theology” at the Christian Associates Global Connect recently we managed...(08/20/2010 - 09:47)
TallSkinnyKiwi review of The Future of the People of GodI gave Andrew Jones a copy of The Future of the People of God at the Christian Associates Global Connect last week and he’s read and reviewed it already. It’s a very fair and perceptive...(08/19/2010 - 13:44)
Rewriting the debate: resurrection and RomansMy friend Hilary has been reading The Future of the People of God and had a question about a paragraph on page 49. Since it has reference one of the critical arguments of the book – that the...(08/19/2010 - 12:57)
Straws in the wind: why the emerging church still mattersBrian LePort (Near Emmaus) suggests, not unreasonably, that the more pertinent question is not whether the emergent church has a problem with the doctrine of a final judgment (see previous post) but...(07/31/2010 - 11:58)
Paul the maker of theatrical scenery?Here’s an interesting thought. In The Hermeneutics of Doctrine (70), as part of a discussion on ‘Christian Doctrine as Dramatic Narrative’, Thiselton notes the argument of L.L....(07/28/2010 - 13:21)
Lk. 12:4-5 - Killed and thrown into GehennaThis saying presupposes the threat to their lives that the disciples would face when they announced the coming of the reign of God to Israel (cf....(18 Jul 2007)
Dunn, Hurtado, and the worship of JesusThere should be a copy of J.D.G. Dunn’s Did the First Christians Worship Jesus? waiting for me when I next get back to the UK. In the meantime...(25 Jul 2010)
Saturday 21 April 2007
22 All this has taken place so that there might be fulfilled what was spoken by the Lord through the prophet, saying,
23 ‘Behold, the young woman will conceive and will bear a son, and they will call his name his name Immanuel’, which is translated ‘God with us’.
The announcement that Jesus will ‘save his people from their sins’ is followed immediately by the reference to the prophecy in Isaiah about a virgin or young woman who will bear a son whose name will be Immanuel (Isaiah 7:14).
This child will not actually do anything: he does not grow up to become a saviour or king. But his birth will be a sign to king Ahaz that within a few years Judah will be overrun by the Assyrians because he was unwilling to trust God (7:10-13): ‘The Lord will bring upon you and upon your people and upon your father’s house such days as have not come since the day that Ephraim departed from Judah – the king of Assyria’ (7:17). The river of the Assyrian army will flow into the land of the child Immanuel (8:8), but it will not in the end sweep away Jerusalem and the house of David. The fact that ‘God is with us’ is an assurance that when Jerusalem faces military disaster, God will not allow his people to be completely overwhelmed (8:9-10).
Matthew transfers this paradigm to the situation faced by first century Israel: the birth of Jesus is similarly a sign - by virtue of its exceptional circumstances - that when the nation faces destruction, God will nevertheless be present and will preserve those who fear him. This is what it means to ‘save his people from their sins’ (Matt. 1:21). For Matthew the birth of Jesus is eschatologically significant - it has to do with the end of the age of second temple Judaism. It is not made an argument for an incarnational understanding of the relationship between Jesus and God.