Matt. 16:17-18 - The gates of Hades will not prevail against it
Tuesday 24 April 2007
17 And answering Jesus said to him, ‘You are blessed, Simon Bar-Jona, because flesh and blood did not reveal (this) to you but my father in the heavens. 18 And I say to you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my congregation, and (the) gates of Hades shall not prevail against it.
Matt. 16:17-18 (My translation)
This verse has often been used to support a theology of spiritual warfare. In fact, Jesus is saying something quite straightforward but crucial for the continuation of the community of believers and the success of the message that they proclaimed.
1. ‘Gates of hades’ (pulai hadou) is a semitic idiom for death or proximity to death: cf. Job 38:17; Ps. 9:13; 107:18; Is. 38:10; Wisd. 16:13; Odes 11:10; and 3 Macc. 5:51: ‘(The Jews) cried out in a very loud voice, imploring the Ruler over every power to manifest himself and be merciful to them, as they stood now at the gates of death (pros pulais hadou).’
2. Hades is not associated with the demonic or understood as the dwelling place of Satan. Heb. 2:14 speaks of Satan as the one who has the ‘power of death’, but this is not enough to show that the ‘gates of Hades’ can be a metonymy for the hosts of hell.
3. The verb katiskuō with the genitive is dynamic: it means ‘overpower’, rather than ‘withstand’ (cf. Jer. 15:18 LXX). Therefore, ‘the gates of Hades/death will not overpower the church’. There is no suggestion that the church will or should launch an assault on the powers of death or demonic forces.
Jesus is saying, therefore, that the ‘gates of hades will not overcome the church’. But his point is not that the church must be always on the defensive. What he is saying is that as the disciples undertake a mission that will bring them into conflict with hostile political and spiritual forces, that will put their lives at risk, they can be reassured that nothing, not even death, will ultimately overcome the community that is based on the confession of Jesus as the Christ. The statement is important, therefore, precisely because the church must put itself at risk by going out into the world. This is what Jesus goes on to talk about: he himself would suffer, be killed, and be raised from the dead; but anyone who chose to follow him would also have to take up his cross, lose his life, and be glorified with the Son of man (16:21-28).
Trinitarian theology and missionAnother Xchange session at the Christian Associates Summer Connect (see also The kingdom of God as a means to an end) attempted to address the relevance (or otherwise) of Trinitarian theology for...(08/23/2010 - 10:37)
Euangelion (briefly) on The Future of the People of GodSome brief, non-analytical but very gratifying comments (let’s be honest) on The Future of the People of God from Joel Willitts at Euangelion, including the following:Wow! Read that again...(08/21/2010 - 18:46)
The kingdom of God as a means to an endWhy is the ‘kingdom of God’ such a tricky theological notion? In a group discussion on ‘Kingdom Theology” at the Christian Associates Global Connect recently we managed...(08/20/2010 - 09:47)
TallSkinnyKiwi review of The Future of the People of GodI gave Andrew Jones a copy of The Future of the People of God at the Christian Associates Global Connect last week and he’s read and reviewed it already. It’s a very fair and perceptive...(08/19/2010 - 13:44)
Rewriting the debate: resurrection and RomansMy friend Hilary has been reading The Future of the People of God and had a question about a paragraph on page 49. Since it has reference one of the critical arguments of the book – that the...(08/19/2010 - 12:57)
Straws in the wind: why the emerging church still mattersBrian LePort (Near Emmaus) suggests, not unreasonably, that the more pertinent question is not whether the emergent church has a problem with the doctrine of a final judgment (see previous post) but...(07/31/2010 - 11:58)
Paul the maker of theatrical scenery?Here’s an interesting thought. In The Hermeneutics of Doctrine (70), as part of a discussion on ‘Christian Doctrine as Dramatic Narrative’, Thiselton notes the argument of L.L....(07/28/2010 - 13:21)
Blessing in microcosmMichael Thompson correctly points out that the argument about blessing and righteousness and the Deuteronomic code would be helped if we kept in view the seminal statement in Genesis 12:3 that Israel...(07/27/2010 - 11:47)
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theologyI regard myself as an evangelical, but the social and intellectual structures that have sustained and made sense of modern evangelicalism are...(13 May 2010)
The kingdom of God: not ‘now and not yet’It is a commonplace of Reformed and evangelical theology that the kingdom of God is ‘now and not yet’. In one sense it has already...(11 Jul 2010)
The mission of the church after ChristendomIn a paper on ‘The Nicene Marks in a Post-Christendom Church’ (2006) Darrell Guder discusses the challenges facing mainline Protestant...(27 Apr 2010)
Matt. 19:28 - Judging the twelve tribes of IsraelThe assertion here (and in Lk. 22:28-30) that the disciples will sit on thrones with Christ may have a quite specific reference to the eschatological...(12 Feb 2008)
Islam in America and the end of ChristendomThere has been a lot of fuss in the news recently about opposition to the construction of mosques in the US – from Temecula Valley to Ground Zero....(24 Jul 2010)
Tuesday 24 April 2007
17 And answering Jesus said to him, ‘You are blessed, Simon Bar-Jona, because flesh and blood did not reveal (this) to you but my father in the heavens. 18 And I say to you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my congregation, and (the) gates of Hades shall not prevail against it.
This verse has often been used to support a theology of spiritual warfare. In fact, Jesus is saying something quite straightforward but crucial for the continuation of the community of believers and the success of the message that they proclaimed.
1. ‘Gates of hades’ (pulai hadou) is a semitic idiom for death or proximity to death: cf. Job 38:17; Ps. 9:13; 107:18; Is. 38:10; Wisd. 16:13; Odes 11:10; and 3 Macc. 5:51: ‘(The Jews) cried out in a very loud voice, imploring the Ruler over every power to manifest himself and be merciful to them, as they stood now at the gates of death (pros pulais hadou).’
2. Hades is not associated with the demonic or understood as the dwelling place of Satan. Heb. 2:14 speaks of Satan as the one who has the ‘power of death’, but this is not enough to show that the ‘gates of Hades’ can be a metonymy for the hosts of hell.
3. The verb katiskuō with the genitive is dynamic: it means ‘overpower’, rather than ‘withstand’ (cf. Jer. 15:18 LXX). Therefore, ‘the gates of Hades/death will not overpower the church’. There is no suggestion that the church will or should launch an assault on the powers of death or demonic forces.
Jesus is saying, therefore, that the ‘gates of hades will not overcome the church’. But his point is not that the church must be always on the defensive. What he is saying is that as the disciples undertake a mission that will bring them into conflict with hostile political and spiritual forces, that will put their lives at risk, they can be reassured that nothing, not even death, will ultimately overcome the community that is based on the confession of Jesus as the Christ. The statement is important, therefore, precisely because the church must put itself at risk by going out into the world. This is what Jesus goes on to talk about: he himself would suffer, be killed, and be raised from the dead; but anyone who chose to follow him would also have to take up his cross, lose his life, and be glorified with the Son of man (16:21-28).