Matt. 5:17-18 - I came not to invalidate the Law or the Prophets but to fulfil
Saturday 03 November 2007
Do not think that I came to invalidate the Law or the Prophets; I came not to invalidate but to fulfil. 18 For truly, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, one iota or one dot may not pass away from the law, until all things should take place.
Matt. 5:17-18 (My translation)
Jesus explicitly attaches a temporal limit to the validity of the Torah: ‘until all things take place (panta genētai)’. The allusion to the new heaven and earth imagery of Isaiah 65:17; 66:22 points to an eschatological-historical crisis of judgment and restoration that is imagined as a renewal of creation. We may quite naturally connect ‘until all things take place’ with Jesus’ assurance in Matthew 24:34 that the present generation of Jews would not pass away before ‘all these things take place (panta tauta genētai). ‘All these things’ are the desolation of Jerusalem and the vindication of the Son of man. This is Jesus’ eschatological horizon, and we should allow it to frame his teaching.
In what sense does Jesus ‘fulfil’ the law? Precisely in bringing a sword of judgment rather than peace (Matt. 10:34): this is how he ‘fulfils’ the law (cf. Deut. 28:25) and the prophets (cf. Ezek. 21:2-3). So the law now condemns Israel to destruction. It remains in force, therefore, until that point, until the flood of God’s judgment comes and sweeps the house away, when it is the house built on Jesus’ word that will remain standing.
When he says in 5:20 that their righteousness must exceed that of the scribes and Pharisees if they are to enter the kingdom of heaven, he is making a more or less rhetorical point: Israel faces the judgment that the law prescribes because the leaders of the people have not been righteous.
Real theological thinkingMy friend Wes recently sent me this quotation from Henri Nouwen:Real theological thinking, which is thinking with the mind of Christ, is hard to find in the practice of the ministry. Without...(09/06/2010 - 07:13)
Trinitarian theology and missionAnother Xchange session at the Christian Associates Summer Connect (see also The kingdom of God as a means to an end) attempted to address the relevance (or otherwise) of Trinitarian theology for...(08/23/2010 - 10:37)
Euangelion (briefly) on The Future of the People of GodSome brief, non-analytical but very gratifying comments (let’s be honest) on The Future of the People of God from Joel Willitts at Euangelion, including the following:Wow! Read that again...(08/21/2010 - 18:46)
The kingdom of God as a means to an endWhy is the ‘kingdom of God’ such a tricky theological notion? In a group discussion on ‘Kingdom Theology” at the Christian Associates Global Connect recently we managed...(08/20/2010 - 09:47)
TallSkinnyKiwi review of The Future of the People of GodI gave Andrew Jones a copy of The Future of the People of God at the Christian Associates Global Connect last week and he’s read and reviewed it already. It’s a very fair and perceptive...(08/19/2010 - 13:44)
Rewriting the debate: resurrection and RomansMy friend Hilary has been reading The Future of the People of God and had a question about a paragraph on page 49. Since it has reference one of the critical arguments of the book – that the...(08/19/2010 - 12:57)
Straws in the wind: why the emerging church still mattersBrian LePort (Near Emmaus) suggests, not unreasonably, that the more pertinent question is not whether the emergent church has a problem with the doctrine of a final judgment (see previous post) but...(07/31/2010 - 11:58)
Paul the maker of theatrical scenery?Here’s an interesting thought. In The Hermeneutics of Doctrine (70), as part of a discussion on ‘Christian Doctrine as Dramatic Narrative’, Thiselton notes the argument of L.L....(07/28/2010 - 13:21)
Eschatology, Anabaptism, and the end of ChristendomI have recently had a very interesting conversation by email with Jonas Lundström, who for a Swede writes remarkably good English, and Graham Old (...(30 Jan 2008)
Lk. 1:67-79 - The Benedictus of ZechariahThe Benedictus of Zechariah corresponds to Mary’s Magnificat (Luke 1:46-55) and echoes its central theme, which is that YHWH has acted to...(21 Dec 2006)
Who was Jesus?Here’s an extraordinary insight into the historical Jesus from an ancient source that is unquestionably independent of the Gospels. The...(12 May 2010)
Saturday 03 November 2007
Do not think that I came to invalidate the Law or the Prophets; I came not to invalidate but to fulfil. 18 For truly, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, one iota or one dot may not pass away from the law, until all things should take place.
Jesus explicitly attaches a temporal limit to the validity of the Torah: ‘until all things take place (panta genētai)’. The allusion to the new heaven and earth imagery of Isaiah 65:17; 66:22 points to an eschatological-historical crisis of judgment and restoration that is imagined as a renewal of creation. We may quite naturally connect ‘until all things take place’ with Jesus’ assurance in Matthew 24:34 that the present generation of Jews would not pass away before ‘all these things take place (panta tauta genētai). ‘All these things’ are the desolation of Jerusalem and the vindication of the Son of man. This is Jesus’ eschatological horizon, and we should allow it to frame his teaching.
In what sense does Jesus ‘fulfil’ the law? Precisely in bringing a sword of judgment rather than peace (Matt. 10:34): this is how he ‘fulfils’ the law (cf. Deut. 28:25) and the prophets (cf. Ezek. 21:2-3). So the law now condemns Israel to destruction. It remains in force, therefore, until that point, until the flood of God’s judgment comes and sweeps the house away, when it is the house built on Jesus’ word that will remain standing.
When he says in 5:20 that their righteousness must exceed that of the scribes and Pharisees if they are to enter the kingdom of heaven, he is making a more or less rhetorical point: Israel faces the judgment that the law prescribes because the leaders of the people have not been righteous.