“Functional subjection does not necessitate ontological inferiority.”
this makes no sense. u r arguing that each person has IDENTICAL powers. if one of them gets subjected to the other, then one of them has more authority than the other. how do you get “functionally subordinated” when the power in each is inherent in each ? unless the son does not take it off and lock it away (CHANGE in nature) , how do you functionally subordinate?
if x shares identical powers with y , y “functionally subordinates” using the same powers ? what ? you are saying the same powers are being used to command and subornicate, how does that work?
“i through my power, command u”
“i through the same power am subjected to the command which is from the same identical power”