Those of us that you see here defending “orthodoxy” do it because we are convinced that the orthodoxy we are defending is indeed the correct understanding of the Biblical texts. An understanding that was come to and hammered out centuries ago and had it’s beginnings in the first century. If I was convinced that “orthodoxy” was wrong, I would most certainly not be defending it.
I am also a bit confused by your comment about orthoxoy and fruit. Would you please clarify that? And does it have any direct relationship to the conversations on this subject on this blog?