This is the old problem of criterion. Andrew has adopted an unorthodox interpretive paradigm. As long as he looks at the Scripture through this paradigm, he will continue to arrive at these conclusions. His argument and the paradigm upon which it rests are not sound theological conclusions from what I see. However, I am in the process of looking at some material he pointed me to so that I can provide a more thorough response to the rules and priniciples of that paradigm. Look for some posts from me regarding his hermeneutic. That is where things should get much more interesting from my perspective.