Recent comments

Comments found: 9767

Resurrection, rapture and relevance

Daniel Levy → Andrew: Andrew, I, for the most part
Andrew → Daniel James Levy: I’m not sure what to make of
Daniel James Levy → Andrew: Very
Andrew → Daniel Levy: Sorry, you’re right. That was
Daniel Levy → Andrew: Andrew, thank you for going
Andrew → Daniel Levy: Daniel, I’m not entirely sure
Daniel Levy → Andrew: Furthermore, the book review
Daniel Levy → Andrew: First off, thanks so much

Scot McKnight on Peter Leithart’s defence of Constantine

peter wilkinson → paulf: You don’t have to accept Paul
paulf → peter wilkinson: Thanks for the intelligent
peter wilkinson → paulf: “God made a promise that he
paulf → peter wilkinson: It’s interesting have much
peter wilkinson → paulf: It was precisely because of
paulf → peter wilkinson: Peter: Do you really think
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Andrew - just stepping back

The community of the Beatitudes and the restoration of creation

Andrew → Brian MacArevey: I had a look at the ‘now but
Brian MacArevey → Andrew: Thanks for having this
Andrew → Brian MacArevey: My question to you would be:
Brian MacArevey → Andrew: Hey Andrew, I read through
Andrew → Brian MacArevey: Hi Brian. I think that the
Brian MacArevey → Brian MacArevey: Hey Andrew, I have been
paulf → peter wilkinson: Peter, this is a

Prophecy and predetermination

Adrenalin Tim → Andrew: There is very often, maybe
Andrew → Travis Greene: I take your point. There is
Travis Greene → Travis Greene: Sorry about the typos. Thunk?
Travis Greene → Andrew: Good thoughts. I thunk

The ‘rapture’ in its literary and historical setting

Andrew → Daniel James Levy: Hi Daniel, thanks for taking
Daniel James Levy → Andrew: Hello Dr. Perriman,  I’ve