Skip to main content
Menu
P.OST
How to tell the biblical story in a way that makes a difference
Recent discussion
Andrew:
It’s a fair question, John,…
John M Baumberger:
Hi Andrew. If I’m…
Helge Seekamp:
“I would describe myself as…
Joel Rice:
Yes. It was interesting to…
Andrew:
Interestingly, the Hebrew…
more
P.OST
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Reviews of books, etc.
Podcasts and videos
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Podbean
On Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Feedly
RSS
Search
Recent comments
Comments found: 9785
Seeing Differently (and Daniel Kirk's review of The Future of the People of God)
Jim Hoag → Andrew
:
Thanks Andrew,
Ancient text and modern reader: a simple hermeneutical model
Andrew → Jim Hoag
:
These are tough questions,
Jim Hoag → Andrew
:
Another keeper Andrew….the
Douglas Campbell and the right(eous)ness of God
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
Sorry, I didn’t realize the
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
This is degenerating into a
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
The narrative has as its
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
I agree that the presence or
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
OK, let’s suppose that you
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
There is far too much here to
Andrew → paulf
:
What does the second member
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
1. You’re right. The verb
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
Andrew - I just stupidly
paulf → peter wilkinson
:
My last post was only
paulf → peter wilkinson
:
Or maybe Jesus was just a guy
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
Peter, a few points
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
It’s taking you a long time
Post-Christendom and the global church
ScottL → Andrew
:
Thanks for this post, Andrew.
Scripture as the (historical) theological interpretation of history
Jim Hoag → ScottL
:
Interesting discussion. And
ScottL → Andrew
:
Andrew - Thanks for your
How does scripture speak to the world?
paulf → Andrew
:
The problem with Paul
Andrew → ScottL
:
Scott, I’ve written a piece
ScottL → Andrew
:
Or more to the point,
Paul Fromont → Andrew
:
Hey Andrew, thanks for being
Andrew → paulf
:
Paul, I’ve only got time for
paulf → Andrew
:
Andrew, you speak of
The prophetic relationship of the people of God to the “land”
Brian MacArevey → Andrew
:
Thanks Andrew, This was
ScottL → Andrew
:
Yes, it would be great to
Andrew → ScottL
:
Now that would have been a
ScottL → Andrew
:
You said: What now is the
Andrew → ScottL
:
The discussion is on page 91.
Pagination
First page
« First
Previous page
‹‹
…
Page
313
Page
314
Current page
315
Page
316
Page
317
Page
318
…
Next page
››
Last page
Last »
Subscribe to Recent comments
P.OST
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Reviews of books, etc.
Podcasts and videos
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Podbean
On Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Feedly
RSS
Search
Recent discussion