Skip to main content
Menu
P.OST
How to tell the biblical story in a way that makes a difference
Recent comments
Andrew:
With regard to non…
Andrew:
My previous comment…
Andrew:
Right. I don’t think we see…
Tim Peebles:
My previous comments raised…
Tim Peebles:
As a Neo-Anabaptist, my…
more
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Why you should get some theological (by which I really mean biblical) education
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments
Comments found: 10225
Did Jesus act as though he thought he were God?
paulf → Anon
:
Anon, I’m not sure whether
Anon → Andrew
:
Andrew - the apparent
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
Peter, I don’t think so
Phil McCheddar → peter wilkinson
:
Peter, while waiting for
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
“Regarding Jeffrey John’s
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
Regarding Jeffrey John’s
peter wilkinson → Phil McCheddar
:
Just to go back to Matthew
Andrew → Phil McCheddar
:
Well, maybe, though it’s hard
Phil McCheddar → Andrew
:
When Jesus forgave the
paulf → peter wilkinson
:
Good questions, but I don’t
paulf → Phil McCheddar
:
Good question, I’ll answer
Phil McCheddar → paulf
:
Paul, I agree it’s not a
Phil McCheddar → Andrew
:
The Council only seems
peter wilkinson → paulf
:
Paul - I’m very much not
Andrew → paulf
:
Phil (not Paul?), I agree
paulf → Andrew
:
Andrew, I enjoy the civil and
Andrew → paulf
:
Yes, it’s a boring game and
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
It’s alright, Peter. You can
paulf → peter wilkinson
:
So let’s play the “cite the
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
(From the other side, by one
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
Yes, I think we’ll have to
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
Andrew - it could go on for a
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
Peter, we could go on forever
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
No, Matthew 9:1-7 doesn’t
Andrew → Phil McCheddar
:
Nowhere does the NT caution
Phil McCheddar → Andrew
:
Rivetting discussion! But at
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
I see no evidence anywhere
paulf → terri
:
Terri, see my response above.
paulf → peter wilkinson
:
I agree with one thing — that
Jesus past and present
Andrew → Derek Flood
:
I’m with you on all those
Pagination
First page
« First
Previous page
‹‹
…
Page
336
Page
337
Page
338
Page
339
Page
340
Page
341
Next page
››
Last page
Last »
Subscribe to Recent comments
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Why you should get some theological (by which I really mean biblical) education
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments