A rhetorical approach to the christological crux in Romans 9:5

In Romans 9:4-5 Paul lists the several prerogatives of his own people, the Jews, the last being that from them is “the messiah according to the flesh.” Then comes this clause: “the one being over all God blessed forever, amen.”

Here we have the christological crux.

Do we put a period after “according to the flesh” and punctuate this as an independent benediction or doxology, keeping messiah and God apart?

…the messiah according to the flesh. The one being over all, God, (be) blessed forever, amen.

Or does the benediction apply to “the messiah,” appositionally or as a predicate, who is therefore said to be in some sense divine?

…the messiah according to the flesh, the one being over all, God, blessed forever, amen.

Technically, there are other options—putting the period after “the one being over all,” for example. But in practice this is the basic choice. There’s no point in over-complicating matters.

Read more...
The Future of the People of God available on Amazon.com
My book The Future of the People of God: Reading Romans Before and After Western Christendom has just become available at Amazon.com. Backcover information about the book can be found in this post. ( | 1 comment)
Is Christianity really any good for the world?
Daniel Kirk asks a great question: Is Christianity really any good for the world? ‘Is the world a better place because of our allegiance to Christ? Or are all the moves toward making the world a better place done by others and baptized by us?’ What prompted the soul-searching was the observation… ( | 2 comments)
The Future of the People of God: Reading Romans Before and After Western Christendom
I have just noticed that The Future of the People of God: Reading Romans Before and After Western Christendom is now available on the Wipf and Stock website (also available on Amazon). I haven’t actually got my own hands on a copy yet, but one should be winging its… ( | 6 comments)
The coming of a ‘new world order’: why Jesus wasn’t wrong
I had set out to respond rather briefly to some remarks made by paulf in a comment on my “The kingdom of God: not ‘now and not yet’” post, but in the excitement that response has swollen to the proportions of a whole new post. Paulf stated: The imminent kindgom of God, which was a new world… ( | 2 comments)
David Fitch, Hirsch and Frost, and the de-ecclesiologization of mission
David Fitch has posted a series of articles presenting a thoughtful and constructive critique of the emerging/missional church. He looks at Peter Rollins’ deconstructionist approach to scripture and warns that it risks de-incarnationalizing the Word of God; he raises concerns… ()
The kingdom of God: not ‘now and not yet’
It is a commonplace of Reformed and evangelical theology that the kingdom of God is ‘now and not yet’. In one sense it has already arrived; in another sense it hasn’t. According to Wikipedia the argument goes back to the Princeton Calvinist theologian Gerhardus Vos. Some sort of ‘now and not… ( | 10 comments)
In self-defence
What is it about theology – or perhaps, what is it about human intellectual activity generally – that makes it so hard for us to listen to each other well, read carefully what others have written, and restate each other’s views accurately? And then, what is it that makes us so cross,… ()