Skip to main content
Menu
P.OST
How to tell the biblical story in a way that makes a difference
Recent comments
Lee:
Nerva is recorded as the…
Lee:
Consider that IN HIS Olivet…
Elliot:
I do wonder why paul would…
Elliot:
Hi Andrew, so would you…
Thomas Howard:
Luke’s genealogy shows that…
more
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Some of the things I do and why
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments
Comments found: 10167
More on the narrative logic of salvation: “we have redemption through his blood”
Donald → Peter
:
Thanks Peter, does that mean
Peter → Donald
:
Hi Donald,
Andrew → Donald
:
I haven’t had much to say
Donald → Andrew
:
Hi Andrew, i liked your
Andrew → Peter
:
Not really, the literary
Peter → Andrew
:
Any idea why the Gospel of
The rise and fall of the modern evangelical paradigm
Takashi Kojima → Andrew
:
Thanks for the prompt
Andrew → Peter
:
By “sectarian” I mean a group
Peter → Andrew
:
“I think it will also be
The logic of salvation for Jews and Gentiles in Paul
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
…the “You” of 2:1 is
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
Thanks for the reprise of
Andrew → Milan Bizic
:
I’m struggling to envision
Andrew → Takashi Kojima
:
Thanks for the question. I’ve
Milan Bizic → Andrew
:
“The only way to resolve this
Takashi Kojima → Andrew
:
Your (narrative-historical
Peter Leithart on the “Christendom model” of church-state relations
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
Just saying that there was
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
Jesus changed the rules for
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
“In this sense Christendom is
Doane → Bob MacDonald
:
Bob,
Bob MacDonald → Andrew
:
I confess to being baffled by
Doane → Andrew
:
Glad to see you enjoying
Paul’s argument about the atonement of Israel in Romans 3-4
Heather Z → Andrew
:
There has always been a
What do I mean when I say that Jesus is my personal Lord and saviour?
Wes → Doane
:
Not answering for Andrew, but
Donald → Andrew
:
Very helpful, thank you
peter wilkinson → Philip Ledgerwood
:
Thanks Phil. I’m actually
Philip Ledgerwood → peter wilkinson
:
Hi Peter,
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
Actually, your defence of
Rich → Andrew
:
Andrew,
Rich → Andrew
:
My argument about the death
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
As I said, you have
Pagination
First page
« First
Previous page
‹‹
…
Page
108
Page
109
Page
110
Page
111
Page
112
Page
113
…
Next page
››
Last page
Last »
Subscribe to Recent comments
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Some of the things I do and why
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments