Skip to main content
Menu
P.OST
How to tell the biblical story in a way that makes a difference
Recent comments
Samuel Conner:
Thank you, Andrew. This is…
davo:
Andrew, thanks for…
Andrew:
I doubt I will ever read the…
X. József:
You are right to fault the…
Evalsam:
Please reply to this “reply”…
more
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Some of the things I do and why
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments
Comments found: 10145
Peter Leithart on the “Christendom model” of church-state relations
Doane → Andrew
:
Glad to see you enjoying
What do I mean when I say that Jesus is my personal Lord and saviour?
Donald → Andrew
:
Very helpful, thank you
peter wilkinson → Philip Ledgerwood
:
Thanks Phil. I’m actually
Philip Ledgerwood → peter wilkinson
:
Hi Peter,
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
Actually, your defence of
Rich → Andrew
:
Andrew,
Rich → Andrew
:
My argument about the death
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
As I said, you have
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
I don’t think it is a
Andrew → Rich
:
That sounds as if you think
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
The historic thesis strips
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
I don’t know what either of
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
Phil has given, to my mind,
peter wilkinson → Philip Ledgerwood
:
I think you I agree with most
Philip Ledgerwood → peter wilkinson
:
Thanks, Peter.
peter wilkinson → Philip Ledgerwood
:
Gosh. Thanks! As far as I can
Philip Ledgerwood → peter wilkinson
:
Well, I guess it might seem
peter wilkinson → Philip Ledgerwood
:
Seems a bit vague to me.
Doane → Andrew
:
Andrew,
Rich → Andrew
:
That is to say, the prayer
Philip Ledgerwood → peter wilkinson
:
“Why should we assume that
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
The problem with all this, as
Philip Ledgerwood → Andrew
:
At core, whether people agree
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
Andrew → Donald
:
Thanks, Donald. Here is a
I said you are gods…
Rich → Peter
:
Peter,
Rich → John
:
John,
Rich → Peter
:
Peter,
John → Andrew
:
Have you interacted with Paul
Peter → Peter
:
“thanks,” not “thinks” :)
Peter → Rich
:
Hi Rich,
Pagination
First page
« First
Previous page
‹‹
…
Page
108
Page
109
Page
110
Page
111
Page
112
Page
113
…
Next page
››
Last page
Last »
Subscribe to Recent comments
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Some of the things I do and why
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments