Recent comments

Comments found: 10184

“Jesus is Lord” before (and after) Trinitarian orthodoxy

Marc Taylor → Andrew: Hello,

The Lost World of Genesis One is lost on me

Andrew → Casey: More on the subject here.
Andrew → Casey: Where is the evidence that
Casey → Andrew: Good thoughts on Walton’s
Rich → peter wilkinson: Peter,
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Just before the lost world of
Travis Finley → Andrew: Not to put too fine a point
Andrew → Travis Finley: There’s a glaring “implicitly
Travis Finley → Andrew: I suppose I would say, let
peter wilkinson → Rich: Because I like speculating,
Rich → peter wilkinson: Peter,
peter wilkinson → Andrew: I’ve already provided the
Andrew → peter wilkinson: But where’s the evidence?
peter wilkinson → Andrew: I think it is quite a good
Andrew → Travis Finley: I get what you saying. But I
Andrew → peter wilkinson: It’s arguable that the Temple
Andrew → Philip L Ledgerwood: To illustrate the debate
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Andrew - I wonder if,

Larry Hurtado’s (non-apocalyptic) Destroyer of the gods

Andrew → Larry Hurtado: It says on the back cover,
Larry Hurtado → Andrew: Andrew: I fear that you may
Andrew → Larry Hurtado: Well, that was a nice
Larry Hurtado → Andrew: Thanks for the attention to
Rich → Andrew: Andrew,

Talking Jesus: how does the Trinity fit in?

Andrew → JT John Tancock: John, thanks for this. I’ve
JT John Tancock → Andrew: Focus in on Romans 10, we
Peter → Andrew: Very clear explanation!
Andrew → JT. John tancock: The ‘name’ they prayed in,
JT. John tancock → Andrew: It wasn’ t like that of

Talking Jesus: problems with the modern evangelistic paradigm

Andrew → Neil: Thanks for the question, Neil
Neil → Andrew: Hi Andrew,
Subscribe to Recent comments