Recent comments

Comments found: 10209

Rethinking Matthew’s coming of the Son of Man

Phil Ledgerwood → Jerel Kratt: Hey Jerel,
Phil Ledgerwood → Andrew: Maybe the idea of Jesus
Andrew → Phil Ledgerwood: Would this cause any
Jerel Kratt → Andrew: BTW I meant to say that I
Jerel Kratt → Andrew: I apologize in advance for
Phil Ledgerwood → Andrew: Placing the primary locus of

The stories we get so animated about

Andrew → Phil Ledgerwood: Thanks. You can laugh, that’s
Phil Ledgerwood → Andrew: The animations are tremendous

Does Jesus have anything to say about homosexuality? Simple answer, no.

peter wilkinson → peter wilkinson: Further on arsenokoites:
peter wilkinson → Andrew: I agree with your argument.
davo → Andrew: Thanks Andrew, yes I read

The resurrection of the Son of God (and the rationalisation of God the Son)

Jaco van Zyl → Andrew: Thank you Andrew. Yes, we
Andrew → Jaco van Zyl : Jaco, I take your point (and
Jaco van Zyl → Andrew: You say: ” The doctrine of
Andrew → Craig Beard: Fixed. Thank you for pointing
Craig Beard → Andrew: Andrew, your link above in
Jaco van Zyl → Andrew: Andrew, I responded to your
Phil Ledgerwood → Kevin Holtsberry: I could not have said it any
Kevin Holtsberry → Andrew: The challenge, I think, is

Who was the suffering servant of Isaiah 52:13-53:12?

Phil Ledgerwood → Andrew: Something about Israel

There are two Trinities in the New Testament and they are not the immanent and economic Trinities

Micah Redding → Doane: I’d like to throw this out

Judgment, kingdom, and sexual immorality

Andrew → John Janzen: No doubt homosexuality has an
John Janzen → Andrew: Andrew, great post! It seems
Andrew → Jaco van Zyl: The simple answer is no.
Andrew → Phil Ledgerwood: Agreed. Part of the modern,
Phil Ledgerwood → Andrew: If there’s a way to get