Recent comments

Comments found: 10167

Rethinking Matthew’s coming of the Son of Man

Jerel Kratt → Phil Ledgerwood: Hi Phil,
Phil Ledgerwood → Jerel Kratt: Hey Jerel,
Phil Ledgerwood → Andrew: Maybe the idea of Jesus
Andrew → Phil Ledgerwood: Would this cause any
Jerel Kratt → Andrew: BTW I meant to say that I
Jerel Kratt → Andrew: I apologize in advance for
Phil Ledgerwood → Andrew: Placing the primary locus of

The Lord’s Supper in narrative-historical perspective

peter wilkinson → Andrew: I don’t see the point of your
Andrew → peter wilkinson: Peter, thanks.
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Another interesting article,
Phil Ledgerwood → Andrew: Thanks for the article,

The meteor sighting on the road to Damascus: why do we believe what we believe?

Andrew → peter wilkinson: But it’s Paul’s language.
Phil Ledgerwood → Andrew: Well, yes, that is the
peter wilkinson → Andrew: 1 Corinthians 15:4-8 - all
Andrew → Phil Ledgerwood: But I guess the part I
Andrew → Rob : I said the resurrection was
Phil Ledgerwood → Andrew: That’s a good point, and I’d
Rob → Andrew: incarnation not supernatural?
Andrew → Phil Ledgerwood: Couldn’t we say that God used
Andrew → Rob : Is the incarnation strictly a
Phil Ledgerwood → Andrew: Over lunch, I was thinking
Phil Ledgerwood → Andrew: An exploding fireball could
Rob → Rob : Sorry I meant to say … (And
Rob → Andrew: Good points Andrew. The thing

The stories we get so animated about

Andrew → Phil Ledgerwood: Thanks. You can laugh, that’s
Phil Ledgerwood → Andrew: The animations are tremendous

Does Jesus have anything to say about homosexuality? Simple answer, no.

peter wilkinson → peter wilkinson: Further on arsenokoites:
peter wilkinson → Andrew: I agree with your argument.

The resurrection of the Son of God (and the rationalisation of God the Son)

Jaco van Zyl → Andrew: Thank you Andrew. Yes, we

Who was the suffering servant of Isaiah 52:13-53:12?

Phil Ledgerwood → Andrew: Something about Israel
Subscribe to Recent comments