Recent comments

Comments found: 10181

Scot McKnight on the historical Jesus and the Jesus of the church

Andrew → don sands: Well, first, the historic
don sands → Andrew: ‘the historical Jesus rather
Mike Gantt → Nan Bush: You are not understanding
Nan Bush → Mike Gantt: Which, if I am understanding
Andrew → Chris C.: Chris, I must say I’m also
Andrew → peter wilkinson: The broad argument is not new
Andrew → donsands: Thanks, as always, for your
Mike Gantt → don sands: Well said.  Amen.
don sands → Thanatos: A good friend of Jesus,
Mike Gantt → Thanatos: Thanatos,
Thanatos → Andrew: For me, all of this
Mike Gantt → Andrew: Canonicity is, practically
Chris C. → Andrew: Hi Andrew,
peter wilkinson → Andrew: I get the impression that
donsands → Andrew: “real” Jesus and the church’s

Was Gehenna a burning rubbish dump, and does it matter?

cruz → Doug in CO: Why didn’t God mention

Fitting the baptism of John into the missional narrative

Mike Gantt → Andrew: Neither I nor my friends
Alex Araujo → Andrew: Thank you, Andrew, for this
Andrew → rob: Rob, thanks for the valuable
Jim Robertson → Andrew: Thank you Andrew. This is a

What’s wrong with the “Romans Road” to salvation?

Andrew → mcrosby: I understand the problem. But
mcrosby → Andrew: I teach youth (grades 7-12)

Some notes on discipleship

Andrew → peter wilkinson: A salutary reminder, much
peter wilkinson → Andrew: On a slightly tangential but
Andrew → Daniel: That would make good sense, I
Daniel → Andrew: It doesn’t seem clear to me
Andrew → Daniel: Well noted. The writer to the
Daniel → Andrew: Good post.

Who is the father in the parable of the prodigal son?

BradK → Andrew: In the meantime here’s a
Norman → Andrew: Andrew,
Subscribe to Recent comments