Recent comments

Comments found: 10165

Resurrection, rapture and relevance

Andrew → paulf: Paul, by ‘churches’ all I
paulf → Andrew: Daniel, one easy to read book

The ‘rapture’ in its literary and historical setting

Andrew → Daniel James Levy: Hi Daniel, thanks for taking
Daniel James Levy → Andrew: Hello Dr. Perriman,  I’ve

Prophecy and predetermination

Andrew → Travis Greene: I take your point. There is
Travis Greene → Travis Greene: Sorry about the typos. Thunk?
Travis Greene → Andrew: Good thoughts. I thunk

The community of the Beatitudes and the restoration of creation

paulf → peter wilkinson: Peter, this is a
Andrew → Jim Hoag: Jim, such a nice comment—it’s
Jim Hoag → Andrew: Andrew, you said to Peter W.,
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Why is it not optional for
Andrew → peter wilkinson: You’re reading too much into
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Transposition (of the
Andrew → peter wilkinson: Peter, I suggested that the
peter wilkinson → Andrew: The beatitudes certainly have
Brian MacArevey → Andrew: Thanks Andrew :) I will be
Andrew → Brian MacArevey: Hi, Brian. Thanks for

Roger E. Olson: Opposing Calvinism

Andrew → Jim Hoag: Thanks, Jim. This seems to
Jim Hoag → Andrew: Andrew, you said, “To a large

How shall we sing the Lord’s song in a strange land?

Jim Hoag → Andrew: Andrew, DO see “Social
Andrew → Jim Hoag: Thanks, Jim. Helpful
Jim Hoag → Andrew: Andrew, thanks. It’s
Andrew → paulf: Jesus taught that God would
paulf → Andrew: I don’t understand the point

Scot McKnight on Peter Leithart’s defence of Constantine

Andrew → peter wilkinson: Exegesis is pointless if it
peter wilkinson → Andrew: I was critiquing your comment
Andrew → peter wilkinson: Peter, a couple of
peter wilkinson → Andrew: I raised a question here

Campbell’s The deliverance of God: three problems, one culprit, two books

Andrew → Sam: Sam, just a quick response
Sam → Andrew: Interesting observations. I
Subscribe to Recent comments