Skip to main content
Menu
P.OST
How to tell the biblical story in a way that makes a difference
Recent comments
Andrew:
Another solid rebuttal…
Andrew:
Thank you. Let me try and…
Peter Igaga :
Let us first look back at…
X. József:
The argument advanced in the…
X. József:
First, the appeal to 1 Cor 8…
more
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Some of the things I do and why
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
On Podbean
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments
Comments found: 10029
The coming of a ‘new world order’: why Jesus wasn’t wrong
paulf → Andrew
:
Andrew: Interesting post, but
The kingdom of God: not ‘now and not yet’
Andrew → paulf
:
I’ve responded to paulf’s
paulf → peter wilkinson
:
Andrew,
ScottL → Andrew
:
Ah, so you might say ‘the
Andrew → ScottL
:
Scott, I wouldn’t call myself
ScottL → Andrew
:
Great article
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
Andrew - very detailed, yet
Will preaching the gospel to all the nations trigger the end?
Andrew → Rogier
:
Ro, I’m very happy to comment
Rogier → Andrew
:
Hi Andrew, As always, I
Did Jesus act as though he thought he were God?
Phil McCheddar → paulf
:
I think the “liar or lunatic”
paulf → Phil McCheddar
:
Phil, I said the same thing
Phil McCheddar → paulf
:
Paul, I don’t think God wants
paulf → Anon
:
Anon, you say: “Andrew - my
Anon → Andrew
:
Andrew - my view is that the
paulf → Anon
:
Anon, I’m not sure whether
Anon → Andrew
:
Andrew - the apparent
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
Peter, I don’t think so
Phil McCheddar → peter wilkinson
:
Peter, while waiting for
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
“Regarding Jeffrey John’s
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
Regarding Jeffrey John’s
peter wilkinson → Phil McCheddar
:
Just to go back to Matthew
Andrew → Phil McCheddar
:
Well, maybe, though it’s hard
Phil McCheddar → Andrew
:
When Jesus forgave the
paulf → peter wilkinson
:
Good questions, but I don’t
paulf → Phil McCheddar
:
Good question, I’ll answer
Phil McCheddar → paulf
:
Paul, I agree it’s not a
Phil McCheddar → Andrew
:
The Council only seems
peter wilkinson → paulf
:
Paul - I’m very much not
Andrew → paulf
:
Phil (not Paul?), I agree
paulf → Andrew
:
Andrew, I enjoy the civil and
Pagination
First page
« First
Previous page
‹‹
…
Page
329
Page
330
Page
331
Page
332
Page
333
Page
334
…
Next page
››
Last page
Last »
Subscribe to Recent comments
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Some of the things I do and why
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
On Podbean
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments