Skip to main content
Menu
P.OST
How to tell the biblical story in a way that makes a difference
Recent comments
Samuel Conner:
Thank you, Andrew. This is…
davo:
Andrew, thanks for…
Andrew:
I doubt I will ever read the…
X. József:
You are right to fault the…
Evalsam:
Please reply to this “reply”…
more
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Some of the things I do and why
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments
Comments found: 10145
An illustrated guide to Tom Wright and an introduction to “transtomism”
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
he does not himself
Micah Redding → Andrew
:
I think to truly go ‘trans
Corey Hampton → Andrew
:
I agree with you that there’s
John Shakespeare → Andrew
:
Well, that’s saved me a few
Philip L Ledgerwood → Andrew
:
I feel like the relationship
John the Baptist and the wrath to come
JackM → Andrew
:
Andrew, thanks for rewarding
Andrew → JackM
:
Jack, thanks for your
JackM → Andrew
:
I am not quite sure if you
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
It’s a last gasp perhaps, but
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
Not to take Isaiah’s new
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
but equally you could ask:
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
That’s a reasonable question,
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
If Jesus came not simply to
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
Thank you, but it’s not so
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
…that there is a
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
P.S. Just to demystify things
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
The extracts you have quoted
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
I don’t understand what your
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
Nope. (Surprise surprise).
John Shakespeare → Andrew
:
Yep.
Getting saved in the Gospels
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
I personally wouldn’t
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
No need to apologise.It looks
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
Sorry Andrew, I disagree. You
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
…in trying to describe the
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
Yes, I’ve read Isaiah 65-66,
Philip L Ledgerwood → peter wilkinson
:
Hi Peter,
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
They include new heavens and
peter wilkinson → Philip L Ledgerwood
:
Thanks Phil for some
Philip L Ledgerwood → peter wilkinson
:
Hi Peter,
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
This post seems to have
Pagination
First page
« First
Previous page
‹‹
…
Page
142
Page
143
Page
144
Page
145
Page
146
Page
147
…
Next page
››
Last page
Last »
Subscribe to Recent comments
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Some of the things I do and why
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments