Recent comments

Comments found: 10167

Richard Hays and the God who walks on the sea

Matt Colvin → Andrew: I strongly agree that
Andrew → Matt Colvin: That’s a fair observation.
Matt Colvin → Andrew: Like you, I found this bit
Andrew → Jaco van Zyl: Yes. The problem with Hays’
Jaco van Zyl → Andrew: The book is a disappointment,
Phil Ledgerwood → Andrew: I hear you about classical
Andrew → Phil Ledgerwood: Phil, I too believe in the
Phil Ledgerwood → Andrew: I will preface this comment

Resolving the tension between wrath and love by means of diagrams

Andrew → peter: Peter, most of this I will
peter → Andrew: Actually Andrew, the
Andrew → peter: The burden of proof surely
peter → Andrew: The thread which follows this
Rich → peter: The traditional trinitarian
Andrew → peter: But you have given no
peter → Andrew: We’ve had this argument
Andrew → peter: But this is confusing two
peter → Andrew: But whose problem is it? Mine
Andrew → peter: But whose problem is it? Mine
peter → Andrew: Thank you for this. Does Paul
Andrew → Jim Robertson: Maybe, but everyone’s having
Andrew → Kevin Holtsberry : That’s my argument in a
Kevin Holtsberry → Andrew: Doesn’t the insistence on
Jim Robertson → Andrew: As in slippery slope?
Andrew → peter: Habakkuk offers one

The message of the Bible in one sentence

Bob → Andrew: “Jesus love me; this I know,

And on the cross where Jesus died, the wrath of God was satisfied…

Stephen L → Andrew: “How you would demonstrate
Andrew → Stephen L: However, I’m inclined to
Stephen L → Andrew: By NT are you referring to
Andrew → Stephen L: The Jews worshipped God as
Stephen L → Andrew: Andrew,
Subscribe to Recent comments