Recent comments

Comments found: 10167

Israel and the nations: the limits of Old Testament expectation

Phil Ledgerwood → peter wilkinson: Hey Peter,
Andrew → peter wilkinson: Peter, I despair. You seem
peter wilkinson → Phil Ledgerwood: Thank you for this
Andrew → peter wilkinson: My argument about Matthew all
peter wilkinson → Andrew: the argument in the post
Andrew → peter wilkinson: Peter, I don’t “want” to
Phil Ledgerwood → peter wilkinson: Hi Peter,
peter wilkinson → Andrew: I’m not going off-piste
Andrew → peter wilkinson: This is getting silly. We’re
peter wilkinson → Andrew: But this is not just distinct
Phil Ledgerwood → Andrew: I’m going to officially
Andrew → Phil Ledgerwood: Except that Paul puts Hosea
Phil Ledgerwood → Andrew: Ok, so, just thinking out
Andrew → Phil Ledgerwood: If Peter is writing
Andrew → peter wilkinson: Prophecy about an in
Phil Ledgerwood → Andrew: Ok, I see what you’re saying.
Andrew → Phil Ledgerwood: The passage appears to
peter wilkinson → Andrew: What do you mean by “in
Phil Ledgerwood → Andrew: Andrew,
Andrew → peter: What is clear is their future
peter → Andrew: Gentiles may be not clearly

Hermeneutics, in pictures

Sue → Andrew: This is the best explanation

How are you to escape being sentenced to hell?

Andrew → Alan Bean: Thanks, Alan. You might also
Alan Bean → Andrew: Andrew: I came across your
Phil Ledgerwood → Andrew: That passage seems to have a

The parable of the wedding feast and the man without a wedding garment

peter wilkinson → Andrew: Your “Gentile ministry of
Andrew → peter: But there is nothing in this,
peter → Andrew: Matthew should interpret
Andrew → Roger Amos: Roger, thanks for this. Very
Roger Amos → Andrew: May I throw a spanner in the
Subscribe to Recent comments