Skip to main content
Menu
P.OST
How to tell the biblical story in a way that makes a difference
Recent comments
Samuel Conner:
Thank you Andrew. Perhaps…
Ron Macy:
Don’t forget the most direct…
Ron Macy:
Peter Wilkinson, I apologize…
Jerry:
Satan’s little season and…
Alpha Kamara:
Your illustration says it…
more
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Some of the things I do and why
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments
Comments found: 10182
The meek shall inherit the land: an exercise in hermeneutical restraint
Matt Colvin → Andrew
:
Hi Andrew! I am greatly
Ivan → Andrew
:
If the “meek inheriting the
Kevin Holtsberry → Andrew
:
It strikes me that one reason
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
fine-sounding verses taken
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
Thanks, Peter.Beyond this,
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
I came looking for the car
Andrew → PX
:
See my response above to Sam.
Andrew → sam
:
Sam, I disagree that 7:21-29
PX → Andrew
:
Yes, Jesus is discussing the
sam → Andrew
:
Jesus ends the sermon in 7:21
Mark Edward → Andrew
:
I just did my own blog series
What’s wrong with the “Romans Road” to salvation?
brian hobble → Chris Hall
:
Yes, indeed the law is a
Chris Hall → Brian Hobble
:
The Bible is a multi-faceted
brian hobble → hamilton
:
This discussion is terrific
There are two Trinities in the New Testament and they are not the immanent and economic Trinities
PX → Doane
:
Doane:
Ryan SA → Andrew
:
Thanks.
Doane → Andrew
:
Andrew,
Andrew → Doane
:
But if thats not enough I
Andrew → Ryan SA
:
It’s not really a new idea
Doane → PX
:
PX
Doane → Andrew
:
Andrew,
Ryan SA → Andrew
:
Hi Andrew. Just a question. I
PX → Andrew
:
I agree, however, I'm still
Andrew → PX
:
I would rather move away from
PX → Andrew
:
For one thing, there are
Andrew → Steven Opp
:
Thanks, Steven. You’re right
Steven Opp → Andrew
:
Very interesting!
The begotten Son and the subordinate woman
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
But that is all a matter of
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
The passage(2Samuel 7 etc) is
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
No need to ding-dong. I’m
Pagination
First page
« First
Previous page
‹‹
…
Page
193
Page
194
Page
195
Page
196
Page
197
Page
198
…
Next page
››
Last page
Last »
Subscribe to Recent comments
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Some of the things I do and why
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments