Recent comments

Comments found: 10145

The begotten Son and the subordinate woman

Andrew → Ian Paul: Ian, I’m confused. My
Ian Paul → Steven Opp: 'If he'd said "Love each
Steven Opp → Ian Paul: God's love for us comes from
Ian Paul → PX: This isn't true either!
Ian Paul → Andrew: 'The fact is that it would
Ian Paul → Steven Opp: But if this were right, then
PX → Daniel: It makes me crazy when i read
Steven Opp → Steven Opp: The notion of a relationship
Daniel → Andrew: That may be. I'll have to
Steven Opp → Ian Paul: A marriage is not the Trinity
Ian Paul → Steven Opp: Great…. except that a
Steven Opp → Ian Paul: Ian, Augustine understood the
Ian Paul → Andrew: Thanks for the mention! I
Andrew → Billy North: That’s about right. On 1
Billy North → Andrew: I'm going to stay away from
Andrew → Daniel: Understood, though I still
Andrew → Billy North: Are there any explicit texts
Billy North → Andrew: I suppose for a beginning we
Daniel → Andrew: I just think to say that
Andrew → Daniel: I don’t know if you take a
simon → Andrew: ..the state or the action...?
Daniel → Andrew: I think a complementarian
Andrew → Daniel: OK. I take your point, though
Andrew → peter wilkinson: But 2 Samuel 7 only says that
Daniel → Andrew: Andrew,
Andrew → Billy North: Possibly. It seems to me that
peter wilkinson → Andrew: The father-son relationship
Doane → Andrew: As always Andrew, very
Andrew → Doane: Man and woman become “one”.

Subordination, Trinity and gender

Steven Opp → Andrew: I'll try to answer some of
Subscribe to Recent comments