Recent comments

Comments found: 10225

The book of Acts as political-religious narrative

Matt Dabbs → Jerel Kratt: The phrase can have its roots
Matt Dabbs → Andrew: Thanks for your response. I
Jerel Kratt → Andrew: I think your point Andrew
Andrew → Matt Dabbs: Very helpful, Matt. Thanks. I
Matt Dabbs → Andrew: A couple of thoughts came to

Who are the “elect” in Jesus’ apocalyptic discourse?

peter wilkinson → Andrew: I maintain, in agreement with
Andrew → Rich: I’ll have a look at it, but I
Rich → Andrew: the story doesn’t stop there…
Andrew → Mark Edward: Right, Mark. The motif is
Mark Edward → Andrew: I think it’s also important

It’s not eschatology, folks, it’s just a story

peter wilkinson → Andrew: Luke 21:22 - ekdikēsis.
Andrew → peter wilkinson: Are you suggesting that the
peter wilkinson → Andrew: I’m probably just as appalled
Andrew → peter wilkinson: You obviously haven’t read
peter wilkinson → Andrew: It was not “the good news of
Andrew → peter wilkinson: There was no “gospel” in the
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Andrew - I simply think your
Andrew → davo: I think that from Jesus’
davo → Andrew: We can’t make an exception …
Andrew → peter wilkinson: What I have also said is that
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Yes, the sending out of the
Andrew → peter wilkinson: I do suggest, however, that
peter wilkinson → Andrew: In Mark and Matthew we are
Stephen Patrick → davo: Well said Davo. I fully agree
Ian Paul → Andrew: I think some of the following
davo → peter wilkinson: G’day Peter… thanks for your
Andrew → peter wilkinson: “At that time” in both Mark
peter wilkinson → davo: Davo - the comprehensive
davo → Andrew: As I understand it… it makes

Assessing Dick France’s argument about the parousia of the Son of Man in Matthew

Wayne Coppins → Andrew: Thanks for this detailed
Subscribe to Recent comments