Recent comments

Comments found: 10182

“Hell” and the individual sinner

Jerel → Andrew: Andrew,I agree that Rome is
Andrew → Mark Edward: Thanks, Mark. Youre right. I
Jerel → Mark Edward: I think that is a great point
Mark Edward → Andrew: On your last paragraph,

Violent Jesus vs. non-violent Jesus. And the winner is...?

Doug Wilkinson → Andrew: The reason Paul tells
Kevin Holtsberry → Andrew: That conference on the Life

Who or what will see the Son of Man coming in clouds? And where?

Andrew → Rich: Rich, a few things…I don’t
Rich → Andrew: Andrew,As I started reading

The woman and the dragon

Richard Worden Wilson → Andrew: No, it doesn’t have to be an
Andrew → John: Does it have to be either/or?
John → Andrew: Andrew it still bothers me
Andrew → Richard Worden Wilson: Richard, the prominent
Richard Worden Wilson → Andrew: Apply Occam’s Razor: if the
dave wainscott → Andrew: helpful post..thanks!and it
Doug Wilkinson → Andrew: The connections you made seem

The end of narrative for Christians and Jews

Andrew → Paul Dean: Good question, Paul. I’ve
Paul Dean → Andrew: Amen to your extraordinary
Andrew → paul del signore: Yes, I realize that it is an
paul del signore → Andrew: It seems that the early

Jesus and the authority to forgive sins

steve finnell → Anon: THE APOSTLE PAUL’S CONVERSION

What’s wrong with the “Romans Road” to salvation?

Brian Hobble → Andrew: This discussion is terrific

Wright and the divinity of Jesus

Jaco → Jaco: “The writer of Revelation

The long, difficult story of new creation

Rich → Doug in CO: Doug, very good observations
Andrew → peter wilkinson: I think it’s a poor exchange
peter wilkinson → Andrew: I found myself agreeing with
Doug in CO → Andrew: You started with talking
Kevin Holtsberry → Andrew: At the risk of sounding like

How Paul saw the future

Andrew → Raul: There is no resurrection of
Raul → Andrew: I think that makes good sense
Andrew → Raul: Raul, I think that pretty
Subscribe to Recent comments