Recent comments

Comments found: 10167

A paradigm shift in Pauline studies?

Rich → Andrew: Andrew,The (admittedly
Doug Wilkinson → Andrew: I take Paul’s comment about
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Was political encounter and

1 Thessalonians: a document of eschatological formation

Andrew → Doug Wilkinson: That’s true. It’s why I
Doug Wilkinson → Andrew: I basically agree with your

Either Paul got the timing wrong or we’ve got the end wrong

Doug Wilkinson → Andrew: It wasn’t just Paul. Every
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Maybe Paul had two
davo → Andrew: Paul works primarily within
Kenton → Andrew: Thanks, Andrew. I guess I
Kevin Holtsberry → Andrew: Andrew,Have you ever thought
Andrew → Kenton: Thanks, Kenton, good question
Kenton → Andrew: Andrew-Thanks for all of your

Will all Israel be saved? Hurtado and Wright

John Barach → Andrew: Andrew – In this connection,

Paul (and the righteousness of God)

Andrew → Kevin Holtsberry: Some very apposite
Kevin Holtsberry → Andrew: Do you think some of this
Scott → Andrew: I’m with you.
Andrew → Scott: Yes, but that’s my point. If

What was credited to Abraham by faith?

peter wilkinson → Andrew: Totally, and the use of
Andrew → peter wilkinson: I’ve just noticed God’s
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Indeed. But my thoughts
Andrew → peter wilkinson: I wrote:Abraham‚Äôs trust is

Passover and atonement

Andrew → peter wilkinson: It’s absurd to say that at
peter wilkinson → Andrew: This must be my last comment
Andrew → peter wilkinson: It’s not merely conjectural,
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Just taking the problem of
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Just taking this in a little
peter wilkinson → Andrew: So there was not the
Andrew → peter wilkinson: “Blood” was the significant
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Hebrews 9:5 is explicitly
Andrew → peter wilkinson: That seems a very convoluted
Subscribe to Recent comments