Recent comments

Comments found: 10182

Does the historical interpretation of the parousia really make historical sense?

Andrew → Josh Roach: Hi Josh. Thanks.
Josh Roach → Andrew: Hey Andrew,
Andrew → Samuel Conner: But since history is always
Samuel Conner → Andrew: The thought has occurred to
Alex → Andrew: My assumption is that [Paul]

Getting saved in the Gospels

Andrew → David King: David, you have given no
Phil L. → David King: I wouldn’t say we’re ignoring
David King → Andrew: Regarding John’s section:

The gospel for Jews and Gentiles according to Romans: a summary

davo → Phil L.: Great linked article Phil…
Phil L. → Samuel Conner: Hey Samuel,
Phil L. → peter wilkinson: Yeah.
Samuel Conner → Samuel Conner: A not entirely tongue-in
peter wilkinson → Phil L.: A very indirect question. I
Samuel Conner → Phil L.: I’m glad that you are getting
Phil L. → Samuel Conner: Thank you for bumping my
Samuel Conner → Phil L.: Thanks, Phil. I have been
Andrew → peter wilkinson: It’s already clear that he is
Andrew → peter wilkinson: The direct address to the Jew
Phil L. → Samuel Conner: Hi Samuel,
Samuel Conner → Samuel Conner: I should have been clearer –
Phil L. → peter wilkinson: Hi Peter,
Samuel Conner → peter wilkinson: I very much like NT Wright’s
peter wilkinson → Samuel Conner: Maybe Romans is viewed as a
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Yes, I can see that you are
Samuel Conner → peter wilkinson: I tremble a little to offer

Why won’t there be marriage in the resurrection?

Matt → Eric Breaux: This is a surprising reading,

The Bible Project New Testament Overview: story and history

Andrew → Daniel Lowe: Thank you, Daniel.
Daniel Lowe → Andrew: Dude this is awesome! I’ve

The subversion of the Jewish “hell” in the teaching of Jesus

Paola → Jake: Hello. Not an intellectual

The appointment of the Son of God

john → Marc Taylor: but you missed the point, the
Subscribe to Recent comments