Skip to main content
Menu
P.OST
How to tell the biblical story in a way that makes a difference
Recent comments
Andrew:
Well, I look forward to…
toddh:
I’ll be very interested to…
Elliot:
Hi Andrew, do you think…
Elliot:
According to Jason Staples…
Andrew:
I don’t have strong views on…
more
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Some of the things I do and why
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments
Comments found: 10112
The appointment of the Son of God
Marc Taylor → john
:
I noticed you gave no passage
john → Marc Taylor
:
how come jesus goes around
Marc Taylor → john
:
And yet Stephen prayed to
john → Marc Taylor
:
“That’s not a contradiction.
Marc Taylor → john
:
That’s not a contradiction.
john → Marc Taylor
:
“Jesus didn’t always have to
The gospel for Jews and Gentiles according to Romans: a summary
peter wilkinson → Samuel Conner
:
Thanks very much Samuel. I am
Andrew → Tim Weatherstone
:
Tim, I’m not sure I’ve
Samuel Conner → Phil L.
:
Re: ” There is nothing about
Tim Weatherstone → Andrew
:
Romans was read to the church
peter wilkinson → Phil L.
:
Phil - Thanks again, as ever,
Phil L. → peter wilkinson
:
Hi Peter,
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
Andrew - maybe some of us
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
You may say that God does not
Samuel Conner → Andrew
:
Thank you, Andrew; I find
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
I’ve only just seen this. It
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
Actually, my argument was
Andrew → Samuel Conner
:
Samuel, thank you for this.
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
He then “proves” this from
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
Agreed on the first point.
Samuel Conner → Andrew
:
re: ” that Paul’s argument
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
Romans 1:18-32 is not simply
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
The letter as a whole is
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
This is what I wrote: “It is
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
Romans 2:1-16 has Jew and
Trinity Sunday from the perspective of John in the throne room of God
Marc Taylor → Andrew
:
It doesn’t need to be said
Andrew → Marc Taylor
:
Like you, John Gill in his
Marc Taylor → Andrew
:
John Gill: the conversion of
Andrew → Marc Taylor
:
Marc, this is hardly worth
Marc Taylor → Andrew
:
Andrew,
Pagination
First page
« First
Previous page
‹‹
…
Page
65
Page
66
Page
67
Page
68
Page
69
Page
70
…
Next page
››
Last page
Last »
Subscribe to Recent comments
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Some of the things I do and why
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments