Recent comments

Comments found: 10112

The message of the Bible in one sentence

Phil L. → Jeremiah: Unfortunately, several of
Jeremiah → Andrew: 1 Chronicles 1:1-3, first

Theses about evangelical Christianity

Phil L. → Andrew: Going back through the
Andrew → Phil L.: I was picking it up, somewhat
Phil L. → Andrew: It probably worked until the
Andrew → Phil L.: I think that’s part of what
Phil L. → Andrew: I realize this is not the
Samuel Conner → Andrew: This is a somewhat unkind

It’s a while since we’ve had a diagram about theology and history

Andrew → Samuel Conner: Should we expect that some of
Andrew → Jason Brubaker: You’re barking up the right
Samuel Conner → Andrew: Thanks for another helpful
Jason Brubaker → Andrew: Andrew
Andrew → Arthur Davis: A nice comment, Arthur. Thank
Arthur Davis → Andrew: Thanks for this, Andrew. A

The gospel for Jews and Gentiles according to Romans: a summary

Andrew → peter wilkinson: But pursue this too far, and
peter wilkinson → Phil L.: If you go for a strictly
Phil L. → peter wilkinson: When it comes to kingdom, new
peter wilkinson → Phil L.: Thanks Phil. I’m not wanting
Phil L. → peter wilkinson: I think where we differ is
peter wilkinson → Phil L.: Thanks Phil. Your passion and
davo → Phil L.: Great linked article Phil…

Does the historical interpretation of the parousia really make historical sense?

Andrew → Josh Roach: Hi Josh. Thanks.
Josh Roach → Andrew: Hey Andrew,
Andrew → Samuel Conner: But since history is always
Samuel Conner → Andrew: The thought has occurred to
Alex → Andrew: My assumption is that [Paul]

Getting saved in the Gospels

Andrew → David King: David, you have given no
Phil L. → David King: I wouldn’t say we’re ignoring
David King → Andrew: Regarding John’s section:

Why won’t there be marriage in the resurrection?

Matt → Eric Breaux: This is a surprising reading,
Subscribe to Recent comments