A rhetorical approach to the christological crux in Romans 9:5

In Romans 9:4-5 Paul lists the several prerogatives of his own people, the Jews, the last being that from them is “the messiah according to the flesh.” Then comes this clause: “the one being over all God blessed forever, amen.”

Here we have the christological crux.

Do we put a period after “according to the flesh” and punctuate this as an independent benediction or doxology, keeping messiah and God apart?

…the messiah according to the flesh. The one being over all, God, (be) blessed forever, amen.

Or does the benediction apply to “the messiah,” appositionally or as a predicate, who is therefore said to be in some sense divine?

…the messiah according to the flesh, the one being over all, God, blessed forever, amen.

Technically, there are other options—putting the period after “the one being over all,” for example. But in practice this is the basic choice. There’s no point in over-complicating matters.

Read more...
Is that third horizon just a mirage?
Mike Morrell has articulated a good question about the thesis of The Coming of the Son of Man and Re: Mission. It comes down to this: Given the metaphorical potential of biblical language, what keeps us from deflating all apparently final language to historical… ( | 3 comments)
Should we still be making disciples?
I have argued a couple of times recently that Jesus’ post-resurrection instruction to his followers to make disciples of all nations, which we call the Great Commission, is actually more restricted in its scope than we have traditionally understood it to be. There was some discussion of this point… ( | 2 comments)
Does the future lie with the global church or with the emerging church?
There was an interesting article in the UK Times yesterday about the global success of ‘US-style muscular Christianity’ - that is, evangelicalism. The article is by John Micklethwait and Adrian Wooldridge and is based on their book God is Back: How the Global Revival of Faith is Changing the… ()
What is a missional church? And why I think Mark Driscoll is wrong
I forget quite how I got there - by what tortuous cyber-trail - but I came across a post on Mark Driscoll’s Resurgence blog promoting his new book Vintage Church, in which he touches on the question of what ‘missional church’ is. Driscoll is not naïve. Even from this brief statement… ( | 1 comment)
No, it's not all about AD 70
I’ve just been listening to what strikes me as an excellent introductory podcast on eschatology by Martin Scott - a nice example of how a rethinking of eschatology along narrative-historical lines has the potential for generating good new theological syntheses. It caught my eye because Martin lists… ()
The death of Jesus for the nation
The Pharisees and chief priests warn the Sanhedrin that if the Jesus’ movement gets out of control, ‘the Romans will come and take away both our place (arousin hēmōn… ton topon) and our nation’ – in Caiaphas’ words, the nation will ‘perish’ (Jn. 11:48, 50). There is at least a hint… ()
The resurrection from the dead
The death and resurrection of Jesus, locked together in a brief three-day period, constitute the defining moment of Christian belief. It is here that the light of God’s love for humanity burns most brightly through the dingy fabric of history. But the light of the Easter event can be so… ( | 6 comments)