Recent comments

Comments found: 10145

Substitutionary versus anti-substitutionary theories: both lose, one more than the other

Scott → Andrew: Andrew -

Stories about Jesus: how they fit together, and what he means for us today

Donald → Andrew: Thank you for this

Why did Jesus instruct his disciples not to preach the kingdom of God to Gentiles and Samaritans?

Andrew → Luanne Kirkland: Hi Luanne,
Luanne Kirkland → Andrew: I know that Jesus instructed

A commentary on Owen Strachan’s less than biblical defence of the atonement

Bob MacDonald → Andrew: Thanks again for the emphasis
nate → Andrew: Hey Andrew,

The biblical argument about salvation (my soteriology)

Matthew → Philip L Ledgerwood: I´m lost … sorry …

The Christ-encomium of Philippians 2:6-11 and “Christian” formation

Andrew → peter wilkinson: My response to your first
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Thanks very much Andrew. As

Moses, the apostles, and transformation into the image of Christ (are we there yet?)

peter wilkinson → Andrew: Perhaps the first thing to
Andrew → Daniel Hoffman: Aren’t the tenses in verse 16
Andrew → Charles: In the New Testament context
Daniel Hoffman → Andrew: Andrew, in reading your posts
Charles → Andrew: So we no longer need to
Andrew → Corby Amos: Corby, that’s a very

Jesus the great high priest: no deep magic involved

Andrew → Chris Wooldridge: If one believes that Torah
Chris Wooldridge → Andrew: “The elaborate and somewhat
Andrew → Alex: Fair comment. Does this

A dead guy going to heaven is not metaphysics?

Chris Wooldridge → Andrew: Yes, but what does it mean
david brainerd → Andrew: “However, salvation has
Andrew → Chris Wooldridge: However, salvation has
Chris Wooldridge → Andrew: I’m not convinced that a

A pragmatic non-theory of the atonement

david brainerd → Andrew: “8.Theological accounts of
Andrew → Chris Wooldridge: Had a look at Hebrews here.

Theology and history: is the dam about to break?

david brainerd → Andrew: There is no real difference

2 Corinthians 3:18: back to where I started