Skip to main content
Menu
P.OST
How to tell the biblical story in a way that makes a difference
Recent comments
Andrew:
I presume for the church in…
John Morehead:
I couldn’t agree more. A few…
Samuel Conner:
Thank you Andrew. Perhaps…
Ron Macy:
Don’t forget the most direct…
Ron Macy:
Peter Wilkinson, I apologize…
more
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Why you should get some theological (by which I really mean biblical) education
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments
Comments found: 10184
A pragmatic non-theory of the atonement
Andrew → Chris Wooldridge
:
Had a look at Hebrews here.
Moses, the apostles, and transformation into the image of Christ (are we there yet?)
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
Perhaps the first thing to
davo → Andrew
:
The phrase “from glory to
Andrew → Daniel Hoffman
:
Aren’t the tenses in verse 16
Andrew → Charles
:
In the New Testament context
Daniel Hoffman → Andrew
:
Andrew, in reading your posts
Charles → Andrew
:
So we no longer need to
Andrew → Corby Amos
:
Corby, that’s a very
Corby Amos → Andrew
:
Hi Andrew,
2 Corinthians 3:18: back to where I started
Andrew → Alex
:
Alex, thanks for the input.1.
Andrew → Rob Kampen
:
Yes, that’s the basic
Alex → Andrew
:
Hey Andrew -
Rob Kampen → Andrew
:
Interesting discussion - it
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
Well, to be honest, Peter,
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
Thanks for the reply. I didn
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
It’s interesting to think
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
Don’t both arguments
John Shakespeare → Andrew
:
You were right in the first
Philip Ledgerwood → Andrew
:
This is why I’m glad nobody
We all are being transformed into the same image—a correction (of sorts)
Andrew → Volker
:
Yes, the problem is that I
Volker → Andrew
:
So, in verse 16 Paul says
Andrew → Volker
:
Thanks, Volker. I still need
Andrew → Peter
:
I think that if we wish to
Peter → Andrew
:
Well, I guess I have no
Volker → Andrew
:
Andrew, thanks a lot for your
Andrew → Peter
:
There’s no need to assume
Peter → Andrew
:
Yes, but I think it’s Paul’s
Andrew → Peter
:
That is an a priori
Andrew → Alex
:
Alex, my response to this
A conversation with Emi about salvation and mission
Johan → Emi
:
Dear Emi
Pagination
First page
« First
Previous page
‹‹
…
Page
129
Page
130
Page
131
Page
132
Page
133
Page
134
…
Next page
››
Last page
Last »
Subscribe to Recent comments
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Why you should get some theological (by which I really mean biblical) education
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments