Recent comments

Comments found: 10167

A handy 17 point summary of the narrative-historical perspective on the wrath of God

Phil Ledgerwood → Rich: Well, I’m not a futurist, but
Rich → Phil Ledgerwood: Phil,
Rich → Andrew: Andrew,
Phil Ledgerwood → Andrew: You should teach New
Andrew → Rich: The question seems to me to
Andrew → Phil Ledgerwood: Yes. I would stress that
Phil Ledgerwood → Andrew: Do you think that inductive
Phil Ledgerwood → Rich: Putting this together for
Rich → Andrew: Andrew,

The wrath of God and the death of Jesus

Nicky → Nicky: And to bring back to the
Nicky → Rich: Rich: What if you warned your
Rich → Nicky: Nicky,
Andrew → Nicky: The “collateral damage”
Nicky → Andrew: The term “collateral damage”
Phil Ledgerwood → Paul: That’s a possible hypothesis,
Paul → Phil Ledgerwood: Hey, you are posting Thursday
Phil Ledgerwood → Paul: The Old Testament is full of
Paul → Andrew: Andrew, yes, that is the
Rich → Rich: Andrew,
Andrew → Rich: Caiaphas’ argument is not
Rich → Andrew: Andrew,
Phil Ledgerwood → Andrew: Agreed. I guess my question
Andrew → davo: Possibly, but Caiaphas’
davo → Andrew: But the idea was already
Andrew → Phil Ledgerwood: The texts strongly suggest,
Andrew → Paul: The parable of the wicked
Paul → Andrew: What did the Jews do wrong
Phil Ledgerwood → Andrew: A while back, when talking

20 reasons for thinking that “Babylon the great” is Rome not Jerusalem

Andrew → Don K. Preston (D. Div.): 1. The New Testament texts
Andrew → Don K. Preston (D. Div.): 1. It is wrong to argue that
Subscribe to Recent comments