Recent comments

Comments found: 10184

Markan christology debate

Alex Dalton → Andrew: Hi Andrew - on being “in
Mike K. → Andrew: Hi Andrew, if I could also
Andrew → Billy North: The post is only about Mark.
Billy North → Andrew: Andrew,
Andrew → Alex Dalton: My view is that the sonship
Alex Dalton → Andrew: In further response to your
Alex Dalton → Andrew: I don’t use the “identity”
Alex Dalton → Andrew: Andrew: How is Jesus part of
Alex Dalton → Andrew: “Your way was through the sea
Andrew → Alex Dalton: But Jesus being the Son,
Alex Dalton → Andrew: I think the problem is that

The Son of Man according to Daniel, Enoch and Jesus: it’s the same old story

Andrew → Michael Gladwell: No, I don’t think many people
Michael Gladwell → Andrew: Thanks for this Post. It

What makes us so sure that the harvest is plentiful?

Andrew → Lorena Wood: Fair comment, Lorena. Let me
Lorena Wood → Andrew: OK, if this is contextually

Justification with reference to Wright, Gorman and Campbell

Andrew → Peter: I’m guessing you would say
Peter → Andrew: So it seems you would say
Andrew → Peter: That’s a good question.
Peter → Andrew: Andrew, you concluded with,

Can we believe what Mark believed about the coming of the Son of Man?

Andrew → Eric Blauer: You may be right, Eric, but
Eric Blauer → Andrew: “What it means for the church
Jerel → Andrew: Great article, Andrew. Thanks

The Son of Man sayings and the horizons of New Testament eschatology

Andrew → J. Glenn Friesen: Glenn, thanks again for
Matt Colvin → Andrew: A masterful answer. Thank you
J. Glenn Friesen → Andrew: Andrew, you almost persuade
Andrew → J. Glenn Friesen: Glenn, thanks for engaging.
J. Glenn Friesen → Andrew: Really, Andrew? Constantine’s

Putting the apocalyptic back in apologetics

mason booth → Andrew: new to your website..great
Andrew → Billy North: Hi, Billy.My argument is that
Billy North → Andrew: Andrew,
Subscribe to Recent comments