Recent comments

Comments found: 10145

Babylon the great: all intertextual roads lead to Rome

Andrew → peter wilkinson: I wouldn’t say that the
peter wilkinson → Andrew: This is a great concatenation
Andrew → Matt Colvin: Hi, Matt. Good question.
Matt Colvin → Andrew: “… thrown down with violence,

Yeah, but it didn’t happen: prophecy and historical fulfilment

Andrew → Rich: Hi Rich. My argument from
Rich → Andrew: Andrew,
Phil Ledgerwood → peter wilkinson: Yeah, it is kinda fun.
peter wilkinson → Phil Ledgerwood: Yes, but it’s rather fun, isn
Phil Ledgerwood → peter wilkinson: Yes, I’ve read many a
peter wilkinson → Phil Ledgerwood: I also take the point about
Phil Ledgerwood → Andrew: As someone who’s still on the

20 reasons for thinking that “Babylon the great” is Rome not Jerusalem

Don K. Preston (D. Div.) → Andrew: Peter In Babylon -Again
Andrew → Don K. Preston: How could it ever be affirmed
Don K. Preston → Andrew: My Thoughts on Enoch #2
Andrew → Don K. Preston: There is nothing to suggest
Don K. Preston → Andrew: Andrew Perriman and Enoch–
Andrew → Don K. Preston (D. Div.): We thus have a direct
Don K. Preston (D. Div.) → Andrew: Perriman’s #19 - Revelation

“A woman sitting on a scarlet beast”—who is the woman? what is the beast?

Norman → Andrew: Andrew, I might agree with
Andrew → Don K. Preston: Clearly Jerusalem was a city
Andrew → Norman: Norman, I disagree that the
Norman → Andrew: It appears that Revelation is
Don K. Preston → Andrew: Andrew, thank you for your
Phil Ledgerwood → Andrew: Very interested to hear your
Travis → Andrew: Many thanks to both Andrew
Andrew → Mark Edward: Right. This is Mounce,
Mark Edward → Andrew: “But John’s language does not

If the means are political, so is the end: Wright and the Jewish message of Paul

Andrew → Billy North: That would be one way of
Billy North → Andrew: Andrew,

A handy 17 point summary of the narrative-historical perspective on the wrath of God

Phil Ledgerwood → Rich: Well, ok.
Subscribe to Recent comments