Recent comments

Comments found: 10209

Adams, Wright, Barth, theology, history, time, eternity, and Paul’s letter to the Romans

Larry Siegle → Andrew: What is your perspective of
Rogier → Andrew: Hi Andrew,
Andrew → Phil Ledgerwood: Thanks, Phil. “God is God” as
Phil Ledgerwood → Andrew: Couldn’t agree more.

Can evangelicalism hitch the wagon of church and mission to the horse of historical narrative?

peter wilkinson → Andrew: Indeed, but even on its own

Samuel Adams’ summary of Wright's argument about history and theology

Bill → Andrew: I enjoyed the chart as well.
peter wilkinson → Andrew: To be continued? I appreciate

In the shadow of Babel (a sermon)

peter wilkinson → Andrew: Really like this: the broad
Peterl → Andrew: Powerfull retelling of the
Philip Ledgerwood → Andrew: This is missional to me. We

How might the post-charismatic “missional” church rediscover the gifts of the Spirit?

Peter → Andrew: Another thought just came
Peter → Peter: It seems a narrative
Peter → Andrew: Andrew, do you feel pretty

Heaven and the apocalyptic narrative

Peter → Andrew: So John the Seer had the last

Who is the founder of the narrative-historical hermeneutic?

Charles → Andrew: “3) the apostles then

The lost and the unlost in the parable of the prodigal son

Michael Purnell → peter wilkinson: Wright does not consider the

And on the cross where Jesus died, the wrath of God was satisfied…

Paul D. → Andrew: Wrath, vengeance, suffering

Markan christology debate

Alex Dalton → Andrew: Hi Andrew - I suppose it
Andrew → Alex Dalton: Why would we not think that
Andrew → Alex Dalton: I’m not sure I can do justice
Andrew → Mike K.: Thanks, Michael, I’ve added
Alex Dalton → Andrew: Hi Andrew - on being “in
Mike K. → Andrew: Hi Andrew, if I could also
Andrew → Billy North: The post is only about Mark.
Billy North → Andrew: Andrew,
Andrew → Alex Dalton: My view is that the sonship

20 reasons for thinking that “Babylon the great” is Rome not Jerusalem

Andrew → David Hillary: The reference to the fig tree
David Hillary → Andrew: Thanks for your analysis and
Andrew → David Hillary: David, thanks for this.
David Hillary → Andrew: Andrew, you stated ’ There is
Subscribe to Recent comments