Recent comments

Comments found: 10167

Justification with reference to Wright, Gorman and Campbell

Andrew → Peter: That’s a good question.

Can we believe what Mark believed about the coming of the Son of Man?

Andrew → Eric Blauer: You may be right, Eric, but
Eric Blauer → Andrew: “What it means for the church

The Son of Man sayings and the horizons of New Testament eschatology

Andrew → J. Glenn Friesen: Glenn, thanks again for
Matt Colvin → Andrew: A masterful answer. Thank you
J. Glenn Friesen → Andrew: Andrew, you almost persuade
Andrew → J. Glenn Friesen: Glenn, thanks for engaging.
J. Glenn Friesen → Andrew: Really, Andrew? Constantine’s

Putting the apocalyptic back in apologetics

mason booth → Andrew: new to your website..great
Andrew → Billy North: Hi, Billy.My argument is that
Billy North → Andrew: Andrew,
Rich → Phil Ledgerwood: lol
Phil Ledgerwood → Andrew: No, I’m pretty sure it means

What makes us so sure that the harvest is plentiful?

Peter → Andrew: I keep wondering whether
Rich → Andrew: Andrew,

20 reasons for thinking that “Babylon the great” is Rome not Jerusalem

Don K. Preston (D. Div.) → Andrew: I want to thank Andrew once

Did St. Paul Go to Heaven When He Died? Reconciling Bockmuehl and Wright...

BILLY Byrd → phil_style: The term spiritual body means

I came not to invalidate the Law or the Prophets but to fulfil

Yeah, but it didn’t happen: prophecy and historical fulfilment

Rich → Andrew: Hi Andrew,
Andrew → Rich: Hi Rich. My argument from
Rich → Andrew: Andrew,
Phil Ledgerwood → peter wilkinson: Yeah, it is kinda fun.
peter wilkinson → Phil Ledgerwood: Yes, but it’s rather fun, isn
Phil Ledgerwood → peter wilkinson: Yes, I’ve read many a
peter wilkinson → Phil Ledgerwood: I also take the point about

Babylon the great: all intertextual roads lead to Rome

peter wilkinson → Andrew: Or the text, or all three,
Andrew → peter wilkinson: I wouldn’t say that the
peter wilkinson → Andrew: This is a great concatenation