Recent comments

Comments found: 10184

What makes us so sure that the harvest is plentiful?

Peter → Andrew: I keep wondering whether
Rich → Andrew: Andrew,

Putting the apocalyptic back in apologetics

Rich → Phil Ledgerwood: lol
Phil Ledgerwood → Andrew: No, I’m pretty sure it means

20 reasons for thinking that “Babylon the great” is Rome not Jerusalem

Don K. Preston (D. Div.) → Andrew: I want to thank Andrew once
Don K. Preston (D. Div.) → Andrew: Peter In Babylon -Again
Andrew → Don K. Preston: How could it ever be affirmed

Did St. Paul Go to Heaven When He Died? Reconciling Bockmuehl and Wright...

BILLY Byrd → phil_style: The term spiritual body means

I came not to invalidate the Law or the Prophets but to fulfil

Yeah, but it didn’t happen: prophecy and historical fulfilment

Rich → Andrew: Hi Andrew,
Andrew → Rich: Hi Rich. My argument from
Rich → Andrew: Andrew,
Phil Ledgerwood → peter wilkinson: Yeah, it is kinda fun.
peter wilkinson → Phil Ledgerwood: Yes, but it’s rather fun, isn
Phil Ledgerwood → peter wilkinson: Yes, I’ve read many a
peter wilkinson → Phil Ledgerwood: I also take the point about
Phil Ledgerwood → Andrew: As someone who’s still on the

Babylon the great: all intertextual roads lead to Rome

peter wilkinson → Andrew: Or the text, or all three,
Andrew → peter wilkinson: I wouldn’t say that the
peter wilkinson → Andrew: This is a great concatenation
Andrew → Matt Colvin: Hi, Matt. Good question.
Matt Colvin → Andrew: “… thrown down with violence,

“A woman sitting on a scarlet beast”—who is the woman? what is the beast?

Norman → Andrew: Andrew, I might agree with
Andrew → Don K. Preston: Clearly Jerusalem was a city
Andrew → Norman: Norman, I disagree that the
Don K. Preston → Andrew: Andrew, thank you for your
Phil Ledgerwood → Andrew: Very interested to hear your

If the means are political, so is the end: Wright and the Jewish message of Paul

Andrew → Billy North: That would be one way of
Billy North → Andrew: Andrew,