Recent comments

Comments found: 10209

Adams and Wright: beyond worldviews?

Andrew → Phillip Mutchell: But that distinction only
Phillip Mutchell → Andrew: Possibly, but the fact that
Andrew → phillip mutchell: Perhaps they initially
phillip mutchell → Andrew: Andrew,
Peter → Andrew: Thanks, Andrew.
Andrew → Peter: Hi, Peter. No annoyance. I
Peter → Andrew: Andrew, you wrote: “It is the

Samuel V. Adams and Paul’s “apocalypse of Jesus Christ”

Andrew → peter wilkinson: With respect to your first
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Maybe I’m just being awkward,

The message of the Bible in one sentence

phillip mutchell → TK: That’s a corker.
phillip mutchell → Andrew: Well from the reformed

Two stories about Jesus

Margareth Rose Manning → Rich: its good to be where books
Rich → Margareth Rose Manning: Margaret,
Margareth Rose Manning → Andrew: Thanks for that interesting
John Clements → Philip Ledgerwood: Ditto. Do you think a
Andrew → Scott: Yes, well, indeed…However, I
Philip Ledgerwood → Andrew: That diagram is brilliant.
Scott → Andrew: Athanasius’ voice was not one
Andrew → Scott: Yes, scripture has multiple
Scott → Andrew: This is good stuff, as I

Theological hermeneutics and the meaning of “Immanuel”

Andrew → peter wilkinson: No, there is no Old Testament
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Andrew - the second ‘prophecy
Andrew → peter wilkinson: Also, Matthew was not
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Thank you for doing some
Philip Ledgerwood → Andrew: It seems like a deeper
John Shakespeare → Andrew: You’re doing a grand job here

Adams, Wright, Barth, theology, history, time, eternity, and Paul’s letter to the Romans

Andrew → Samuel Adams: Samuel, thanks for the
Andrew → Larry Siegle: Larry, I fully agree that
Andrew → Rogier: Hi Rogier, very nice to hear
Samuel Adams → Andrew: While I appreciate the review
Subscribe to Recent comments