Recent comments

Comments found: 10184

Theology and history: on totally different wave lengths

peter wilkinson → Andrew: I didn’t have either in mind,
Andrew → peter wilkinson: OK. But that sounds to me
peter wilkinson → Andrew: It’s grammar in the sense
Andrew → peter wilkinson: Whereas the weakness of
phillip mutchell → Andrew: It is true, that so far as
peter wilkinson → Andrew: “A historically oriented
Philip Ledgerwood → Andrew: Worst line of children’s toys

Samuel V. Adams and Paul’s “apocalypse of Jesus Christ”

jerel → phillip mutchell: Great comment, Phillip.
Andrew → Bobby Grow: I think it would help a lot
Andrew → Bobby Grow: Can I also pick up on the use
Philip Ledgerwood → Bobby Grow: >>I would flip this on its
phillip mutchell → Bobby Grow: Bobby,
Bobby Grow → Arie Uittenbogaard: “Shoehorning?”
Arie Uittenbogaard → Andrew: It may even be that these two
Bobby Grow → Andrew: Andrew wrote:
Bobby Grow → Scott: Scott,
Andrew → Bobby Grow: Do you think that there is
Andrew → Bobby Grow: …participatory history (God’s
Bobby Grow → Andrew: Andrew wrote:
Bobby Grow → Andrew: Andrew you wrote:
davo → Andrew: Scripture is not about God
Andrew → Bobby Grow: I read your post. I have two
Andrew → Bobby Grow: Bobby, thanks for your robust
Scott → Bobby Grow: Sola (or solo) scriptura

The Gentiles are saved by the salvation of Israel

Andrew → Rich: It was a speculative
Andrew → Dakota Zook: That’s a nice comment. Thank
Rich → Andrew: Andrew,
Dakota Zook → Andrew: It would be fascinating, and

The Son of Man sayings and the horizons of New Testament eschatology

phillip mutchell → J. Glenn Friesen: Really friend you want the

Two stories about Jesus

Scott → Andrew: Yes, no doubt.
Subscribe to Recent comments