Recent comments

Comments found: 10167

Theological heresy and narrative-historical heresy

phillip mutchell → James Mercer: Have you actually read Rev 21
James Mercer → Andrew: Hi Andrew. I am only too
Philip Ledgerwood → Andrew: What I mean to say is that
Andrew → Philip Ledgerwood: Not sure I follow you…
Philip Ledgerwood → Andrew: “The essence or basic
Mark Edward → Andrew: Andrew,
Kevin keyser → kevin Keyser : On the contrary - if people
kevin Keyser → Mark Edward: Hi Mark :),
Andrew → Mark Edward: You’ll have to read
Mark Edward → Andrew: “Is humanity able to accept

Theology and history: on totally different wave lengths

peter wilkinson → Andrew: But doesn’t your argument
Andrew → peter wilkinson: If this is the case, finding
peter wilkinson → Andrew: I didn’t have either in mind,
Andrew → peter wilkinson: OK. But that sounds to me
peter wilkinson → Andrew: It’s grammar in the sense
Andrew → peter wilkinson: Whereas the weakness of
phillip mutchell → Andrew: It is true, that so far as
peter wilkinson → Andrew: “A historically oriented
Philip Ledgerwood → Andrew: Worst line of children’s toys

Blessed are the narrative-historical interpreters: preaching the Beatitudes

Philip L Ledgerwood → Andrew: And that last bit is the

Samuel V. Adams and Paul’s “apocalypse of Jesus Christ”

jerel → phillip mutchell: Great comment, Phillip.
Andrew → Bobby Grow: I think it would help a lot
Andrew → Bobby Grow: Can I also pick up on the use
Philip Ledgerwood → Bobby Grow: >>I would flip this on its
phillip mutchell → Bobby Grow: Bobby,
Bobby Grow → Arie Uittenbogaard: “Shoehorning?”

The Gentiles are saved by the salvation of Israel

Andrew → Rich: It was a speculative
Andrew → Dakota Zook: That’s a nice comment. Thank
Rich → Andrew: Andrew,
Dakota Zook → Andrew: It would be fascinating, and
Subscribe to Recent comments