Recent comments

Comments found: 10184

Who is Daniel’s son of man?

peter wilkinson → Andrew: The rock in Daniel becomes “a

Andrew → peter wilkinson: The rock in Daniel is not

peter wilkinson → Andrew: My response was also only

Andrew → peter wilkinson: Peter, the article is only

Andrew → Mark Edward: The “anointed one” (9:26) and

peter wilkinson → Andrew: This post so closely follows

Mark Edward → Andrew: Regarding Antiochus rising up

Hurtado’s critique of Wright’s account of Paul’s christology

peter wilkinson → Andrew: The argument about the son of

Andrew → peter wilkinson: Here is the full quote about

peter wilkinson → Andrew: Ferguson is wrong: this son

Andrew → peter wilkinson: Daniel 3:33 is the Masoretic

peter wilkinson → Andrew: One has to pay attention to

Andrew → peter wilkinson: Goldingay:The humanlike

peter wilkinson → Andrew: I think what all this points

Andrew → peter wilkinson: But that doesn’t identify the

peter wilkinson → Andrew: In Daniel 7:14, the word

Andrew → peter wilkinson: How is the son of man figure

peter wilkinson → Andrew: I continue to be struck how,

The resurrection of the sleeping saints from their tombs

Greg Brown → Greg Brown: In regard to εις1519, which

Greg Brown → Andrew: Thank you for your insightful

Andrew → Greg Brown: It’s an interesting argument,

Greg Brown → Greg Brown: It was no doubt due to

Greg Brown → Andrew: One way to solve exegetical

Double Post-Tribulational Pre-Amillennialism

Rich → Andrew: Andrew,

Keith Wansbrough → Andrew: After that he must be

Rich → Andrew: You do have a point. :)

Andrew → Rich: Take it up with Wikipedia.

Rich → Andrew: No Preterist timeline?? I

Andrew → Mark Edward: Partly for lack of space—I

Mark Edward → Andrew: I noticed a distinct lack of

Subscribe to Recent comments