Recent comments

Comments found: 10167

The resurrection of the sleeping saints from their tombs

Greg Brown → Andrew: Thank you for your insightful
Andrew → Greg Brown: It’s an interesting argument,
Greg Brown → Greg Brown: It was no doubt due to
Greg Brown → Andrew: One way to solve exegetical

Hurtado’s critique of Wright’s account of Paul’s christology

Andrew → peter wilkinson: How is the son of man figure
peter wilkinson → Andrew: I continue to be struck how,

Double Post-Tribulational Pre-Amillennialism

Rich → Andrew: Andrew,
Keith Wansbrough → Andrew: After that he must be
Rich → Andrew: You do have a point. :)
Andrew → Rich: Take it up with Wikipedia.
Rich → Andrew: No Preterist timeline?? I
Andrew → Mark Edward: Partly for lack of space—I
Mark Edward → Andrew: I noticed a distinct lack of

16 reasons to think that the “age to come” is now and in history

Andrew → Philip L Ledgerwood: Thanks, Phil. I agree with
Andrew → peter wilkinson: 1. The day of the Lord would
peter wilkinson → Andrew: “I think my argument gives
Philip L Ledgerwood → Andrew: In terms of Ian’s critique, I

N.T. Wright and Paul’s eschatology (with coloured beads)

Andrew → Ian Paul: Thanks for asking. Reponse
Ian Paul → Andrew: I agree with your first four
Andrew → Chris Tilling: Hi Chris,Roughly, yes.The Old
Chris Tilling → Andrew: Great post and wonderful
peter wilkinson → Andrew: This has made me realise that

“Missio Dei” in historical perspectives, part 3

Michael → Andrew: Brother Andrew,

Is suffering part of God’s plan for us?

Philip L Ledgerwood → Andrew: I would say that their
Andrew → Philip L Ledgerwood: I’m broadly sympathetic to
Philip L Ledgerwood → Andrew: Thanks for this, Andrew.
Andrew → Peter: Thanks. Well spotted.
Peter → Andrew: I completely agree. I’ve even

Is the “eternal generation of the Son” a biblical idea?

phillip mutchell → Andrew: I find that such use of

The subordination of the Son, and why it has nothing to do with gender

Ben Lima → Andrew: Thank you very much for
Subscribe to Recent comments