Recent comments

Comments found: 10145

Apocalyptic-Inflationism and new creation

phillip mutchell → Andrew: HI Andrew,
Andrew → phillip mutchell: It just seems more consistent
phillip mutchell → Andrew: Hi Andrew,
Andrew → phillip mutchell: John doesn’t provide much
phillip mutchell → Andrew: Andrew, if you suggest the

Theological heresy and narrative-historical heresy

Andrew → James Mercer: See here.
phillip mutchell → James Mercer: Have you actually read Rev 21
James Mercer → Andrew: Hi Andrew. I am only too
Philip Ledgerwood → Andrew: What I mean to say is that
Andrew → Philip Ledgerwood: Not sure I follow you…
Philip Ledgerwood → Andrew: “The essence or basic
Mark Edward → Andrew: Andrew,
Kevin keyser → kevin Keyser : On the contrary - if people
kevin Keyser → Mark Edward: Hi Mark :),
Andrew → Mark Edward: You’ll have to read
Mark Edward → Andrew: “Is humanity able to accept

Blessed are the narrative-historical interpreters: preaching the Beatitudes

Philip Ledgerwood → Arie Uittenbogaard: Hi Arie,
Arie Uittenbogaard → Andrew: Historical context is always
Philip L Ledgerwood → Andrew: And that last bit is the

Theology and history: on totally different wave lengths

peter wilkinson → Andrew: But doesn’t your argument
Andrew → peter wilkinson: If this is the case, finding
peter wilkinson → Andrew: I didn’t have either in mind,
Andrew → peter wilkinson: OK. But that sounds to me
peter wilkinson → Andrew: It’s grammar in the sense
Andrew → peter wilkinson: Whereas the weakness of
phillip mutchell → Andrew: It is true, that so far as
peter wilkinson → Andrew: “A historically oriented
Philip Ledgerwood → Andrew: Worst line of children’s toys

Samuel V. Adams and Paul’s “apocalypse of Jesus Christ”

jerel → phillip mutchell: Great comment, Phillip.

The Gentiles are saved by the salvation of Israel

Andrew → Rich: It was a speculative
Subscribe to Recent comments