Recent comments

Comments found: 10184

16 reasons to think that the “age to come” is now and in history

Andrew → Philip L Ledgerwood: Thanks, Phil. I agree with
Andrew → peter wilkinson: 1. The day of the Lord would
peter wilkinson → Andrew: “I think my argument gives
Philip L Ledgerwood → Andrew: In terms of Ian’s critique, I

N.T. Wright and Paul’s eschatology (with coloured beads)

Andrew → Ian Paul: Thanks for asking. Reponse
Ian Paul → Andrew: I agree with your first four
Andrew → Chris Tilling: Hi Chris,Roughly, yes.The Old
Chris Tilling → Andrew: Great post and wonderful
peter wilkinson → Andrew: This has made me realise that

“Missio Dei” in historical perspectives, part 3

Michael → Andrew: Brother Andrew,

Is suffering part of God’s plan for us?

Philip L Ledgerwood → Andrew: I would say that their
Andrew → Philip L Ledgerwood: I’m broadly sympathetic to
Philip L Ledgerwood → Andrew: Thanks for this, Andrew.
Andrew → Peter: Thanks. Well spotted.

Is the “eternal generation of the Son” a biblical idea?

phillip mutchell → Andrew: I find that such use of
peter wilkinson → Andrew: I find the theological
Andrew → Andrew: Agreed, though John’s
Philip L Ledgerwood → Andrew: That treatment of John 5:26

The subordination of the Son, and why it has nothing to do with gender

Ben Lima → Andrew: Thank you very much for

Trinity, subordination and narrative in Hebrews 1:1-2

Andrew → peter wilkinson: There isn’t any reference to
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Thanks for the clarifications
Andrew → peter wilkinson: 1. Psalm 88:27 (= 89:27 MT)
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Can you clarify some things

Craig Keener and the fallacy of mutual submission

peter wilkinson → Andrew: This seems a very sane

What must the church become? Narrative and praxis

Peter → Andrew: Thanks for your thoughtful
Peter → Andrew: I’m struggling with your

Why did Jesus instruct his disciples not to preach the kingdom of God to Gentiles and Samaritans?