Recent comments

Comments found: 10167

Mission - the narrative-historical board game

peter wilkinson → Andrew: I wasn’t sure which comment
Peter → Andrew: Andrew, I’m sure you’ve
Andrew → peter wilkinson: To illustrate, Tertullian
Andrew → peter wilkinson: Peter, you have an unerring
peter wilkinson → Andrew: So I know it’s controversial
davey → Peter: I’m inclined to go with Peter
Peter → Andrew: Who has the authority to
John → Andrew: Superb summary. Really enjoy

Is suffering part of God’s plan for us?

Rob → Andrew: Hi Andrew,

Salvation by faith, judgment by works, and the theological captivity of ideas

Peter → Andrew: “they were assured that if

What’s wrong with the “Romans Road” to salvation?

Andrew → genie: Just for clarity, the post is
genie → Andrew: Penguin I completely agree

Misreading the parable of the minas from the post-Christendom margins

Liz Fronduti → Andrew: Thanks for a great article.

Who is Daniel’s son of man?

peter wilkinson → Andrew: The rock in Daniel becomes “a
Andrew → peter wilkinson: The rock in Daniel is not
peter wilkinson → Andrew: My response was also only
Andrew → peter wilkinson: Peter, the article is only
Andrew → Mark Edward: The “anointed one” (9:26) and
peter wilkinson → Andrew: This post so closely follows
Mark Edward → Andrew: Regarding Antiochus rising up

Hurtado’s critique of Wright’s account of Paul’s christology

peter wilkinson → Andrew: The argument about the son of
Andrew → peter wilkinson: Here is the full quote about
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Ferguson is wrong: this son
Andrew → peter wilkinson: Daniel 3:33 is the Masoretic
peter wilkinson → Andrew: One has to pay attention to
Andrew → peter wilkinson: Goldingay:The humanlike
peter wilkinson → Andrew: I think what all this points
Andrew → peter wilkinson: But that doesn’t identify the
peter wilkinson → Andrew: In Daniel 7:14, the word

The resurrection of the sleeping saints from their tombs

Greg Brown → Greg Brown: In regard to εις1519, which
Subscribe to Recent comments