Skip to main content
Menu
P.OST
How to tell the biblical story in a way that makes a difference
Recent comments
Samuel Conner:
Thank you, Andrew. This is…
davo:
Andrew, thanks for…
Andrew:
I doubt I will ever read the…
X. József:
You are right to fault the…
Evalsam:
Please reply to this “reply”…
more
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Some of the things I do and why
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments
Comments found: 10145
My arguments against Ortlund’s restatement of Packer’s arguments against annihilationism
Rich → Jerel
:
Jerel,
Jerel → Rich
:
Rich,
Rich → Jerel Kratt
:
Jerel,
Jerel Kratt → Rich
:
Rich,
Tom Wright on religion and politics: the beginning and end of theocracy
Paul → Jerel
:
Jerel, the obvious problem is
Jerel → Jerel
:
And BTW Paul, you’re wrong
Jerel Kratt → Paul
:
I’m not waiting for it Paul,
John Clements → Andrew
:
Agreed: there is no
Paul → Jerel
:
Since nobody has ever been
Jon Newton → Rob Haskell
:
This is a very interesting
Jerel → Paul
:
The simplist explanation
Paul → Andrew
:
The other possibility is that
Rob Haskell → Andrew
:
Yes, I agree with the power
Andrew → Rob Haskell
:
The argument about post
Rob Haskell → Andrew
:
Greetins - I have always been
Andrew → John
:
According to the reading that
John → Andrew
:
If a theocracy—in the first
Two ways of thinking about resurrection
Doug Wilkinson → Doug Wilkinson
:
Andrew,
Doug Wilkinson → Jerel
:
While Carl doesn’t see a
Jerel → Andrew
:
I just find the Preterist
Andrew → Jerel
:
Jerel, I’m not going to
Andrew → Carl Mosser
:
Carl, thank you for the
Jerel → Andrew
:
I’ve read these posts on
Carl Mosser → Andrew
:
Andrew, I’ve read this post
What happens at the end of Revelation?
Andrew → Chris Jones
:
Yes, I think that would be
Chris Jones → Andrew
:
Andrew,
Andrew → Chris Jones
:
I think it is in keeping with
Chris Jones → Andrew
:
Andrew,
Andrew → Phil Ledgerwood
:
Yes, it probably is hyperbole
Evangelical views of the resurrection
Phil Ledgerwood → Andrew
:
The last diagram is my
Pagination
First page
« First
Previous page
‹‹
…
Page
159
Page
160
Page
161
Page
162
Page
163
Page
164
…
Next page
››
Last page
Last »
Subscribe to Recent comments
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Some of the things I do and why
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments