Skip to main content
Menu
P.OST
How to tell the biblical story in a way that makes a difference
Recent comments
Andrew:
Tim, I honestly can’t take…
Tim:
Hi can you review this site…
Andrew:
With regard to non…
Andrew:
My previous comment…
Andrew:
Right. I don’t think we see…
more
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Why you should get some theological (by which I really mean biblical) education
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments
Comments found: 10227
20 reasons for thinking that “Babylon the great” is Rome not Jerusalem
Rich → Andrew
:
You’re kidding me? I go away
Don K. Preston → Andrew
:
Andrew, I certainly did not
Andrew → Mark Edward
:
A nice post, Mark. Thanks for
Andrew → James F. McGrath
:
Aune connects the burning of
Andrew → Don K. Preston
:
Don, thanks for this. Are you
Don K. Preston → Andrew
:
Andrew, yes, please forgive
Travis → Jerel
:
I second that sentiment,
Jerel → Andrew
:
Commenting so that I can get
Andrew → Don K. Preston
:
Don, I remember our
peter wilkinson → peter wilkinson
:
I’ve had the book for four
peter wilkinson → Don K. Preston
:
Don - I think you meant
Don K. Preston → Andrew
:
Andrew, Don K. Preston here.
Mark Edward → Andrew
:
I actually wrote a short
James F. McGrath → Andrew
:
I don’t recall what exactly
Two ways of thinking about resurrection
Carl Mosser → Andrew
:
Andrew,
Kingdom and mission. What’s changed since Schweitzer? Not much
Jerel → davo
:
Commenting because I want to
davo → Andrew
:
Andrew this is just my
Tom Wright on religion and politics: the beginning and end of theocracy
Jerel → Rich
:
Well we haven’t seen that
Rich → Jerel
:
Paul,
davo → Paul
:
…the obvious problem is that
Jerel → Paul
:
I would be interested Paul in
Paul → Jerel
:
Jerel, the obvious problem is
Jerel → Jerel
:
And BTW Paul, you’re wrong
Jerel Kratt → Paul
:
I’m not waiting for it Paul,
John Clements → Andrew
:
Agreed: there is no
Paul → Jerel
:
Since nobody has ever been
Lead us not into temptation
Rebecca → Andrew
:
Very helpful, may God grant
My arguments against Ortlund’s restatement of Packer’s arguments against annihilationism
Rich → Jerel
:
Jerel,
Jerel → Rich
:
Rich,
Rich → Jerel Kratt
:
Jerel,
Pagination
First page
« First
Previous page
‹‹
…
Page
161
Page
162
Page
163
Page
164
Page
165
Page
166
…
Next page
››
Last page
Last »
Subscribe to Recent comments
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Why you should get some theological (by which I really mean biblical) education
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments