Recent comments

Comments found: 10167

Why the end of the world is the end of the world

Rich → Jerel Kratt: Jerel,
Rich → Andrew: Andrew,
Phil Ledgerwood → Doug Wilkinson: How was Ezekiel validated in
Doug Wilkinson → Phil Ledgerwood: I don’t have problem with
Phil Ledgerwood → Doug Wilkinson: Hey Doug,
Phil Ledgerwood → Jerel Kratt: Hi Jerel,
Doug Wilkinson → Andrew: I want to focus for a moment
Jerel Kratt → Phil Ledgerwood: Hey Phil,
Jerel Kratt → Rich: Rich,
Jerel Kratt → Phil Ledgerwood: I don’t think the OT
Jerel Kratt → Phil Ledgerwood: Hi Phil. Thanks for the kind
Andrew → Rich: Look, Rich, we can agree that
Phil Ledgerwood → Rich: Well, before we become too
Rich → Andrew: Andrew,
Rich → Jerel Kratt: Jerel,
Phil Ledgerwood → davo: I think most people are ok
Phil Ledgerwood → Jerel Kratt: Hi Jerel,
davo → Andrew: Excellent discussion.
Jerel Kratt → Jerel Kratt: Well I missed Andrew’s
Jerel Kratt → Jerel Kratt: I may not have made the point
Jerel Kratt → Rich: Thanks Rich. I agree with you
Phil Ledgerwood → Rich: Hi Rich,
Rich → Phil Ledgerwood: Phil,
Phil Ledgerwood → Andrew: No, that’s a good point. I
Phil Ledgerwood → Rich: Thanks, Rich.
Andrew → Rich: Godawa writes:
Andrew → Phil Ledgerwood: 2 Peter 3:4-7 is certainly
Rich → Phil Ledgerwood: Phil,

Who says that this prophecy has two referents?

davo → Andrew: I’m thinking Rome as an
Andrew → davo: I don’t think so. My argument
Subscribe to Recent comments