Skip to main content
Menu
P.OST
How to tell the biblical story in a way that makes a difference
Recent comments
Samuel Conner:
Thank you, Andrew. This is…
davo:
Andrew, thanks for…
Andrew:
I doubt I will ever read the…
X. József:
You are right to fault the…
Evalsam:
Please reply to this “reply”…
more
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Some of the things I do and why
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments
Comments found: 10145
The Lord said to my lord...
Jaco → Andrew
:
France added nothing new to
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
France, according to your
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
Starting with the accusations
davo → Andrew
:
I agree that Jesus is
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
The interpretive framework of
JT → Berry
:
What an odd wayto look at
Berry → peter wilkinson
:
Peter, at some point you need
Berry → JT
:
Bottom line is that there is
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
Andrew - Once again you hvae
Jaco → JT
:
JT, thanks for taking the
JT → Andrew
:
I would disgaree about many
Andrew → JT
:
Andrews narrative/historical
JT → JT
:
I forgot to finish it before
JT → Jaco
:
Its not hard to see the
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
For trinitarians, there has
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
The wider framework of
Jaco → Berry
:
You are spot-on, BerryThe
JT → Berry
:
Well, the accusation doesn’t
Berry → Andrew
:
Bravo, Andrew. Especially the
Adam, original sin, and wrath against the Jew
Andrew → Michael Davis
:
Possibly, but what evidence
Michael Davis → Andrew
:
I appreciate the post Andrew.
Patrick → Andrew
:
Do we have access to evidence
Andrew → Patrick
:
I would assume that Jesus
Patrick → Andrew
:
Andrew, Your point is well
Andrew → Patrick
:
In the passages where Jesus
Patrick → Pete Enns
:
It seems to me the way Paul
Rob Bell: What we don’t talk about when we talk about God
Ed Dingess → Andrew
:
I don’t think I accused you
Andrew → Ed Dingess
:
Come on, Ed. You are clearly
Ed Dingess → Andrew
:
“Why you church the people of
Ed Dingess → Andrew
:
You continue to place the
Pagination
First page
« First
Previous page
‹‹
…
Page
210
Page
211
Page
212
Page
213
Page
214
Page
215
…
Next page
››
Last page
Last »
Subscribe to Recent comments
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Some of the things I do and why
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments