Skip to main content
Menu
P.OST
How to tell the biblical story in a way that makes a difference
Recent comments
Samuel Conner:
Thank you Andrew. Perhaps…
Ron Macy:
Don’t forget the most direct…
Ron Macy:
Peter Wilkinson, I apologize…
Jerry:
Satan’s little season and…
Alpha Kamara:
Your illustration says it…
more
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Some of the things I do and why
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments
Comments found: 10182
The Lord said to my lord...
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
The wider framework of
Jaco → Berry
:
You are spot-on, BerryThe
JT → Berry
:
Well, the accusation doesn’t
Berry → Andrew
:
Bravo, Andrew. Especially the
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
But I am arguing that the
Jaco van Zyl → peter wilkinson
:
Peter,
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
Thanks for your correction to
Andrew → JT
:
John, just to be clear, the
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
Could you explain what you
JT → peter wilkinson
:
Andrewsreply reinforces the
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
Thanks for your various
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
It’s entirely plausible to
Rich → JT
:
“1. Did Jesus in his pre
Andrew → JT
:
I cannot see what your
JT → Andrew
:
I will repeat again that I
Andrew → JT
:
John, all I am doing is
JT → JT
:
Just a few additional
JT → Andrew
:
AndrewMy problems with your
Andrew → JT
:
John, your comment
Rob Bell: What we don’t talk about when we talk about God
Andrew → Ed Dingess
:
Come on, Ed. You are clearly
Ed Dingess → Andrew
:
“Why you church the people of
Ed Dingess → Andrew
:
You continue to place the
Adam, original sin, and wrath against the Jew
Pete Enns → Andrew
:
Largely the syntax of v. 7.
Andrew → Pete Enns
:
But why is it to obvious that
Pete Enns → Andrew
:
I agree all of this is a side
Andrew → Pete Enns
:
Peter, thanks, that’s a
Pete Enns → Andrew
:
I appreciate your thoughts
Andrew → Rich
:
Rich, if you don’t mind me
Rich → Andrew
:
But what of the sin before
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Ed Dingess → Andrew
:
http://reformedreasons
Pagination
First page
« First
Previous page
‹‹
…
Page
212
Page
213
Page
214
Page
215
Page
216
Page
217
…
Next page
››
Last page
Last »
Subscribe to Recent comments
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Some of the things I do and why
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments