Recent comments

Comments found: 10167

The Lord said to my lord...

Andrew → JT: John, just to be clear, the
Andrew → peter wilkinson: Could you explain what you
JT → peter wilkinson: Andrewsreply reinforces the
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Thanks for your various
peter wilkinson → Andrew: It’s entirely plausible to
Rich → JT: “1. Did Jesus in his pre
Andrew → JT: I cannot see what your
JT → Andrew: I will repeat again that I
Andrew → JT: John, all I am doing is
JT → JT: Just a few additional
JT → Andrew: AndrewMy problems with your
Andrew → JT: John, your comment
JT → Andrew: AndrewIt would be easy to
Andrew → peter wilkinson: Once the perspective of two
Andrew → peter wilkinson: The answer is implied in the
peter wilkinson → Andrew: You assume that there is a

Adam, original sin, and wrath against the Jew

Pete Enns → Andrew: I appreciate your thoughts
Andrew → Rich: Rich, if you don’t mind me
Rich → Andrew: But what of the sin before

Rob Bell: What we don’t talk about when we talk about God

Andrew → John Doyle: Brilliant, John, though it’s
John Doyle → Andrew: Modernity is all about the
Andrew → Kent Haley: Well, yes, I may have
Kent Haley → Andrew: Andrew,I have appreciated
Kevin Holtsberry → Andrew: No, you are right, I don’t
Andrew → Nathanael: Yes, I’ve read Jesus Wants to
Andrew → Kevin Holtsberry: Kevin, I take your point

The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology

Ed Dingess → Andrew: A post outlining my concerns
Ed Dingess → Andrew: Let me try that again. It is

Is the Shema really so important for understanding “one God… one Lord” in 1 Corinthians 8:6?

peter wilkinson → Andrew: I don’t follow this. YHWH
Berry → Andrew: Your analysis on this is spot
Subscribe to Recent comments