Recent comments

Comments found: 10167

Tweaking Richard Bauckham on Jesus and the God of Israel

Richard Worden Wilson → Ed Dingess: With all due respect, Ed, I
Ed Dingess → Richard Worden Wilson: Is it my imagination or does
Richard Worden Wilson → Ed Dingess: Hey Ed,Since it can easily be
Richard Worden Wilson → Ed Dingess: Ed,You ask: “What is the
Jaco → peter wilkinson: Hi PeterIf you look at the
Ed Dingess → Jaco: If texts were instrumental in
peter wilkinson → Jaco: I’m not sure you’ve proved
Jaco → peter wilkinson: Hi PeterI think in our
peter wilkinson → Andrew: In the review, McGrath
Ed Dingess → Andrew: What remains to be shown,
BradK → Andrew: Andrew, a few weeks ago I ran
Andrew → Ed Dingess: You have still not answered
Jaco → Andrew: What some scholars had to say
Ed Dingess → Andrew: Andrew,Your argument that
Andrew → Ed Dingess: Ed, I agree that John is
Ed Dingess → Andrew: All the well-wishing in the
Richard Worden Wilson → Andrew: Great post with clear
cherylu → Andrew: I don’t object to the term in
Andrew → Peter Grice: Thanks, Peter. Your comments
Jaco → peter wilkinson: Hahaha! Good one…
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Dragging myself backwards
Andrew → peter wilkinson: As Jaco pointed out, James
peter wilkinson → Andrew: I may be misreading you, and
Peter Grice → Peter Grice: In the absence of
Peter Grice → cherylu: Trinitarianism belongs to
cherylu → cherylu: I know I have asked the same
cherylu → Andrew: I truly don’t understand how

Is the Shema really so important for understanding “one God… one Lord” in 1 Corinthians 8:6?

peter wilkinson → Andrew: I take your point, but to

Jesus as Lord in Mark

Ed Dingess → Mark Nieweg: Mark,I see two very basic
John Montgomery → Mark Nieweg: Hey Mark,I’m not too
Subscribe to Recent comments