Recent comments

Comments found: 10167

Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament

Rich → cherylu: Cherylu,Don’t get me wrong.
Jaco van Zyl → peter wilkinson: I think Andrew has a good
cherylu → Rich: Rich,My point is that if we
Rich → cherylu: Cherylu,That is an over
cherylu → Rich: I hardly think one can
Rich → cherylu: Cherylu,I picked up on that
cherylu → Andrew: Andrew,I have wondered before
peter wilkinson → Andrew: A very helpful and lucid

Jesus as Lord in Mark

Mark Nieweg → cherylu: Hi Cherylu, It becomes sort
Jaco → JT: JT, I am not on the “outside.
Jaco → cherylu: Aah, you got it, Cheryl.
cherylu → Mark Nieweg: Thanks for the response and
cherylu → Ed Dingess: Ed,But unless I am
cherylu → Ed Dingess: Ed,But unless I am
Andrew → Ed Dingess: Your rule is imposing Philo
JT → Andrew: AndrewI have had the
Mark Nieweg → cherylu: Hi Cherylu,You are correct in
Ed Dingess → Jaco: Jaco,Lets be clear once more.
Ed Dingess → cherylu: That is correct. I recognize
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Slightly by the by, but
Jaco → Ed Dingess: Hi Ed,Obviously you have not
cherylu → Ed Dingess: Ed,Just a quick note.
Ed Dingess → Jaco: Obviously you have not been
Ed Dingess → Andrew: Slave and servant are the
cherylu → Jaco van Zyl: Thanks for your clarification
cherylu → Andrew: Andrew,I note that there are

A hymn of praise to the anti-Caesar

Ed Dingess → Jaco: In addition, I am not sure
Ed Dingess → Jaco: The debate is not over
Jaco → Ed Dingess: This is most certainly a much
Ed Dingess → Andrew: Two quick comments:1. Andrew
Subscribe to Recent comments