Recent comments

Comments found: 10145

Jesus as Lord in Mark

Ed Dingess → Jaco: You do realize that Alford is
cherylu → Jaco: Jaco,What if what Ed said is
Jaco → Ed Dingess: Nothing concrete to add, Ed?
Ed Dingess → Jaco: Hi Jaco,I read your response
Jaco → Ed Dingess: Hi EdMost your thoughts
Ed Dingess → Andrew: One final comment about
Ed Dingess → Andrew: Hi Andrew,John 1:1-18 is
Andrew → Mark Nieweg: I’ve attempted to address
peter wilkinson → Andrew: That is exactly what Daniel 7
cherylu → Andrew: I’m sorry, but this statement
cherylu → Andrew: And for the record, Andrew,
Andrew → cherylu: I didn’t say that one story
cherylu → Andrew: But Andrew, if one “story”
Andrew → cherylu: At risk of oversimplification
cherylu → Andrew: Andrew,You made this comment
Andrew → peter wilkinson: The point is that Paul wants
Andrew → peter wilkinson: Hurtado writes:
peter wilkinson → Andrew: So what was the point of Paul
peter wilkinson → Andrew: …in the light of up to date
Andrew → peter wilkinson: Your word study does not
Andrew → Ed Dingess: I think this has probably got
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Philippians 2:10-11 actually
Ed Dingess → Andrew: Hi Andrew,You are forcing a

What’s wrong with the “Romans Road” to salvation?

Dale → Andrew: Andrew, I appreciate your

Christendom: fulfilment or false start?

peter wilkinson → Andrew: Abraham Heschel’s “theology

Wright and the divinity of Jesus

Jaco → William Jordan: I think it is a very
Andrew → William Jordan: William, thanks for this
William Jordan → Andrew: While it is true that

What about 1 Corinthians 1:30? Nope, no imputation of righteousness here either. So where is it then?

Doug Wilkinson → peter wilkinson: Both the article and Peter’s

The symbolism of the Son of man coming on the clouds and the meaning of kingdom

Cassie → Rich: Hello Brother Rich,I thank
Subscribe to Recent comments