Recent comments

Comments found: 10182

Jesus as Lord in Mark

Andrew → peter wilkinson: Hurtado writes:
peter wilkinson → Andrew: So what was the point of Paul
peter wilkinson → Andrew: …in the light of up to date
Andrew → peter wilkinson: Your word study does not
Andrew → Ed Dingess: I think this has probably got
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Philippians 2:10-11 actually
Ed Dingess → Andrew: Hi Andrew,You are forcing a
Andrew → Ed Dingess: Since this is supposed to be
Ed Dingess → Andrew: ὃς ἐν μορφῇ θεοῦ ὑπάρχων, who
cherylu → Andrew: Andrew,At this point time
Andrew → peter wilkinson: …neither was ‘Lord’ as a
Andrew → Ed Dingess: Ed, I’ve lumped together
peter wilkinson → peter wilkinson: The comment I just posted
peter wilkinson → Andrew: John was not speaking of a
Ed Dingess → Andrew: I have a high view of
cherylu → Ed Dingess: Ed,FYI, the John 1:1 passage
Ed Dingess → Andrew: There is another problem with
Andrew → Ed Dingess: Fundamental to evangelicalism
Ed Dingess → Andrew: The statements in John to
Ed Dingess → Andrew: It is then just plain common
Andrew → Ed Dingess: I don’t particularly regard
Ed Dingess → Andrew: I am simply trying to be as
Andrew → Ed Dingess: I do not know how long the
Ed Dingess → Ed Dingess: “Only if Andrew can show that
Ed Dingess → cherylu: Hi Cherylu,This is why I want
cherylu → Ed Dingess: Hi Ed,Thanks for that comment
Ed Dingess → Andrew: A brief comment about method:
Andrew → cherylu: But I then went on to say,
cherylu → Andrew: “It’s an astute comment, and
Andrew → cherylu: But in this case, you are
Subscribe to Recent comments