Skip to main content
Menu
P.OST
How to tell the biblical story in a way that makes a difference
Recent comments
Lee:
Nerva is recorded as the…
Lee:
Consider that IN HIS Olivet…
Elliot:
I do wonder why paul would…
Elliot:
Hi Andrew, so would you…
Thomas Howard:
Luke’s genealogy shows that…
more
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Some of the things I do and why
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments
Comments found: 10167
Wright and White on the “righteousness of God” in 2 Corinthians 5:21
Andrew → Geoff
:
Thanks for the questions,
Geoff → Jon
:
“What does it mean that “he
Jon → Andrew
:
dsSSClaSo for clarification
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
…much that he says is no less
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
Just a couple of comments on
Jesus is God or Jesus is Lord?
JT John Tancock → cherylu
:
I so agree Cherylu, in fact
cherylu → Andrew
:
Hi Andrew,“that we are wound
JT John Tancock → Andrew
:
I do understand Andrew, got
Andrew → Jaco van Zyl
:
I’m not trying to suppress
JT John Tancock → Andrew
:
AndrewOk no problem. here
Jaco van Zyl → Andrew
:
Aah, would have loved to
Andrew → JT John Tancock
:
How about we call it a day on
JT John Tancock → JT john Tancock
:
The booklet was actually
JT john Tancock → cherylu
:
Hipplolytus says it so better
JT john Tancock → BradK
:
The semantic range of
JT john Tancock → Jaco
:
So many of your comments are
cherylu → Jaco van Zyl
:
Jaco,But we are discussing
cherylu → cherylu
:
Also from Hippolytus: ” Now,
Jaco van Zyl → cherylu
:
Cheryl, I could answer you,
cherylu → Jaco
:
Hi Jaco,I am familiar with
BradK → JT John Tancock
:
John, regarding the issue of
Jaco → Andrew
:
John Tancock,“So Jesus is
JT John Tancock → JT John Tancock
:
Here is the actual resources
JT John Tancock → Jaco
:
JacoIf you re read your own
JT John Tancock → Jaco
:
Great link Cherylu. Now if
The coming of the Son of Man: theology or history?
Rich → Andrew
:
Andrew,I think these words
Ian Paul → BradK
:
As a scholar of Revelation, I
BradK → peter wilkinson
:
“-there is no mention of the
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
Although I said in an earlier
He is near, at the doors
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
Because it’s possibly
Pagination
First page
« First
Previous page
‹‹
…
Page
225
Page
226
Page
227
Page
228
Page
229
Page
230
…
Next page
››
Last page
Last »
Subscribe to Recent comments
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Some of the things I do and why
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments