Recent comments

Comments found: 10182

The coming of the Son of Man: theology or history?

Ian Paul → BradK: As a scholar of Revelation, I
BradK → peter wilkinson: “-there is no mention of the
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Although I said in an earlier
cherylu → Andrew: If you believe that part of
Andrew → cherylu: Luke expresses the view at a
Ian Paul → Andrew: Ye–read it. Interesting. Your
Andrew → Ian Paul: Sorry, Ian, got round to it
cherylu → Andrew: Andrew,Unless I am totally
Andrew → Nash: The kingdom was the earthly
bskeptic → Andrew: If the destruction of
Ian Paul → edwardtbabinski: Well, guys, this seems to
edwardtbabinski → Andrew: Hi Andrew, If we were to

Jesus is God or Jesus is Lord?

JT john Tancock → cherylu: Hipplolytus says it so better
JT john Tancock → BradK: The semantic range of
JT john Tancock → Jaco: So many of your comments are
cherylu → Jaco van Zyl: Jaco,But we are discussing
cherylu → cherylu: Also from Hippolytus: ” Now,
Jaco van Zyl → cherylu: Cheryl, I could answer you,
cherylu → Jaco: Hi Jaco,I am familiar with
BradK → JT John Tancock: John, regarding the issue of
Jaco → Andrew: John Tancock,“So Jesus is
JT John Tancock → JT John Tancock: Here is the actual resources
JT John Tancock → Jaco: JacoIf you re read your own
JT John Tancock → Jaco: Great link Cherylu. Now if
Jaco → JT John Tancock: John Tancock,I am of course
Jaco → cherylu: Hi Cheryl,There is currently
cherylu → Andrew: For Jaco and anyone else that
JT John Tancock → Jaco: Sigh! Jaco you have a most
Jaco → Andrew: John Tancock,“However my

He is near, at the doors

peter wilkinson → Andrew: Just to atone for my
Subscribe to Recent comments