Skip to main content
Menu
P.OST
How to tell the biblical story in a way that makes a difference
Recent comments
Andrew:
With regard to non…
Andrew:
My previous comment…
Andrew:
Right. I don’t think we see…
Tim Peebles:
My previous comments raised…
Tim Peebles:
As a Neo-Anabaptist, my…
more
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Why you should get some theological (by which I really mean biblical) education
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments
Comments found: 10225
Wright and White on the “righteousness of God” in 2 Corinthians 5:21
Andrew → Chaplain Mike
:
Thanks, Mike. That’s well
Chaplain Mike → Andrew
:
In addition to the excellent
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
This is what I actually said
Andrew → Geoff
:
Answers to the questions can
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
But I still see no imputation
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
“Credited as righteousness”
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
Abraham’s faith in God was
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
Andrew – what an
Geoff → Andrew
:
It makes sense that
Andrew → Geoff
:
Thanks for the questions,
Geoff → Jon
:
“What does it mean that “he
More on the righteousness of God and the justification of believers
Andrew → Geoff
:
Still not sure I see what you
Geoff → Andrew
:
So if you expressed your
Andrew → Geoff
:
I would argue that the new
Geoff → Andrew
:
“There is no sacrifice, no
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
What exactly is this new
Andrew → Geoff
:
Geoff, I have no problem
Andrew → Nathan Willard
:
Nathan, thanks. I take your
Andrew → Rich
:
Rich, I’ve been meaning to go
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
We are reconciled to God by
Geoff → Andrew
:
Your explanation of Jesus
Nathan Willard → Andrew
:
I love this especially this
Rich → Andrew
:
Andrew,Your answer to “What
Jesus is God or Jesus is Lord?
Andrew → Andrew Perry
:
Marvellous! But no need to
Andrew Perry → Andrew
:
Sorry for having the same
Andrew → JT John Tancock
:
The sudden appearance of
JT John Tancock → Andrew Perry
:
Can’t find the companion
Andrew Perry → JT John Tancock
:
Yes, and I have now put a
JT John Tancock → Andrew Perry
:
u are andrew Perry then? I
Andrew Perry → JT John Tancock
:
HelloSorry to use the KJV -
Pagination
First page
« First
Previous page
‹‹
…
Page
226
Page
227
Page
228
Page
229
Page
230
Page
231
…
Next page
››
Last page
Last »
Subscribe to Recent comments
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Why you should get some theological (by which I really mean biblical) education
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments