Recent comments

Comments found: 10145

The coming of the Son of Man: theology or history?

peter wilkinson → Andrew: Andrew - first of all, I hope
davo → Ian Paul: Hi Ian, what I’m pointing to
Andrew → peter wilkinson: I’m actually addressing the
peter wilkinson → Andrew: You have misread me. I’m not
Ian Paul → davo: This seems really odd to me
davo → Andrew: For mine… I think it makes
Ed babinski → Andrew: Nice article, I agree the
Andrew → peter wilkinson: This is not putting all my
peter wilkinson → Andrew: To place all your theological
Ian Paul → Andrew: Another minor exegetical
Ian Paul → Ian Paul: Oh and he used to point out
Ian Paul → Andrew: Yes, absolutely. He has an
Andrew → Ian Paul: I haven’t come across France
Ian Paul → Andrew: Thanks for this clear

Jesus is God or Jesus is Lord?

Jaco → JT John Tancock: John, I am not surprised that
Jaco → JT John Tancock: John, you are of course
JT John Tancock → Jaco: I didnt realise there was a
JT John Tancock → Jaco: textual authenticity is not
Jaco → JT John Tancock: That is precisely why your
JT John Tancock → Jaco: neither rash (I have a
Jaco → BradK: Aah, I hear you, BradK. I
BradK → Jaco van Zyl: I don’t necessarily disagree,
Jaco van Zyl → BradK: BradK, I hear you and I agree
BradK → JT John Tancock: John Tancock’s question about
Jaco → JT John Tancock: Another rash and short

What’s wrong with the “Romans Road” to salvation?

Andrew → Penguin: Penguin, thanks for taking
Penguin → Andrew: I think if you’re going to

Good Friday: the death of Jesus in narrative-historical context

Andrew → peter wilkinson: I argue that it breaks open
Bill → Andrew: Well written and very
peter wilkinson → Andrew: What seems to me so
Subscribe to Recent comments